메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김영순 (인하대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
627 - 658 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Transfer prices between multinational related parties are areas of intense interest in domestic taxes and tariffs. Because the transfer price is intercompany price, it is easy to manipulate the profit and cost and evade the due taxation. The National Tax Service(NTS) basically perceived that intercompany financial guarantee fee that the parent company received from the subsidiaries was so small and manipulate the transfer pricing. NTS had developed the model of normal value of the financial guarantee fee from 2008, and had collected about 300 billion won in corporate tax from 100 companies that have paid guarantees to overseas subsidiaries since 2012. However, the most courts decided that the NTS model is not a reasonable transfer pricing method. The reasons are that the informations was not open and unavailable, that used the bankruptcy data of only domestic companies and didn't reflect non-financial factors. Moreover it did include the implicit support that reflect the mother company's credit rate and subsidiary's status in the same group. The NTS appealed. However, when the appeal failed to persuade the rationality of the NTS model, NTS terminated the procedure by arbitration, and 34 out of 39 lawsuits were terminated by arbitration. The problem is that no regulations have the tax arbitration and there is no criteria when the court suggests arbitration. It is clear that the tax authority must not dispose the taxation that regulations allow. To addition it is necessary to confirm and review the illegality of taxation, instead of arbitration.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0