메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이형구 (법무사)
저널정보
한국민사집행법학회 민사집행법연구 민사집행법연구 제13권
발행연도
2017.1
수록면
281 - 317 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Civil Execution Act is a highly fluid law that breathes on the site and engages with reality. As execution takes part in the filed of Comprehensive Law, basis regulation that has no impartiality to any individual must be the foundation in solving a problem more than anything. Although it is said that the new enacted Civil Execution Act has been improved compared to the former Act, one of the contents that still causes dissatisfaction is the regulation under article 143. The mission of the execution process is to end the case with the given facts with definiteness, clearness, and quickly. It is thought that the essence of the execution process lies in the satisfaction of the creditor, debtor, and the buyer, just like the triangle definition. It can be said that the process of the buyer making the payment means the end of execution. Therefore, when the buyer appears and says that they will buy the property of the subject of the execution. although the court makes a decision, they are in fact answering by making an ‘announcement’. The reason for this is because the decision of the buyer itself takes a crucial part in the execution process. The eligibility condition of the buyer, whether it is a normal buyer or a specialized buyer, must consider the approval decision of the court after extensive examination, and the expansion of that decision. However, when considering section one regarding the takeover of obligation to the buyer, and section two regarding the payment excluding the dividend for the buyer in Article 143, the authority of the buyer seems to have been overly expanded, and there are no period of time of a declaration of assumption of debt which acts like provision of payment. If there is, it can be said that it is until the distribution date. On the working level, the day distribution is made by the execution court is more than a state of tension. As stored cash is being used, although it is right for the distribution process to happen after all the actions have been made, the fact that the payment is being distributed straight after it has been received is only giving a burden to the execution court. Furthermore, opposite to assumption of debt, as it has been stressed that the process of paying the rest of the money excluding the dividend to the buyer, in other words the time limit of payment is until the decision date of the permission of sale, there won’t be many that will understand this section. The buyers that are trying to make use of this Act finds it even more difficult to understand this law. It is depressing enough that they need to go through an application for auction themselves or through a third person in a difficult state of not being able to receive reimbursement of their own 채원 previously. However to execute the process of the payment only after a week of the bidding date in that situation causes repulsion of the Act, even if the payment is being provided straight away. Whether there is a strong need for this has to be considered. Although it is an act that protects the buyer by omitting the preparation stage of the payment, in a way, there is a great chance of making them suffer in various aspects. Therefore, it is thought that an extensive research and reorganization on this Act must be carried out so that no harm is made in the process of the Civil Execution Act.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0