메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김보향 (제주대학교)
저널정보
한국언어문학회 한국언어문학 한국언어문학 제108호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
7 - 30 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present research aims to examine how passivity is realized in Jeju dialect by investigating its characteristics. Compared to common language, one unique feature of passivity in Jeju dialect is that passivity based on passive suffix has a very low productivity and shows a conspicuous form of passivity using ‘-eojida’. That is, in Jeju dialect, passive expressions combined with passive suffix are not that common whereas the form combined with ‘-eojida’ are widely prevalent. As a result of comparing the realization of passivity in Jeju dialect with the spoken corpus analyzed by Sehwan Kim(2007), lexical passivity of ‘doe-da, bat-da, dang-ha-da’ shows similar figures (27.3% and 28.5%) whereas there is significant difference in terms of derivative passivity (3.6% and 40.5%) and syntactic passivity (69.1% and 31%). In Jeju dialect, ‘-eojida’ is being realized at the level of approximately 70%, which demonstrates how widely the passive expression of ‘-eojida’ is being used in Jeju dialect. According to the result of classifying the meanings of ‘-eojida’ used in sentences of Jeju dialect introduced in <Jeju dialect oral source book>, they can be categorized into ‘passivity’, ‘possibility’, ‘perfect’, ‘change of status’, and ‘involuntary’. As in common language, there is no doubt that ‘-eojida’ in Jeju dialect is significant in the meanings related to ‘passivity’. However, in common language, passivity is realized by being combined with the passive suffix whereas in Jeju dialect, only a small portion of passivity forms are accompanied by the passive suffix, and syntactic passivity is more prevalent. Meanwhile, there are few cases in Jeju dialect where ‘-eojida’ is combined with adjectives. When ‘-eojida’ is combined with an adjective, it indicates the change of status. In Jeju dialect, this semantic function is replaced by ‘-am/eom’ combined at the end of an adjective. Therefore, when compared with common language, the portion of ‘status change’ in semantic function of ‘-eojida’ is low. In Jeju dialect, passivity based on passive suffix is limited. ‘Bbat-gi-da, ssoi-da, jjot-gi-da’ are the examples, and future research should focus on diachronic examination of the reason why certain verbs do not form syntactic derivatives.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0