메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이준희 (고려대학교)
저널정보
노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제34호
발행연도
2021.11
수록면
181 - 209 (29page)
DOI
10.46329/LLF.2021.11.34.181

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Article 60-(2) of the Labor Standards Act of Korea stipulates that "Every employer shall grant any employee who has continuously worked for less than one year or who has worked less than 80 percentage of one year one paid-leave day for each month during which he/she has continuously worked..". This regulation was enacted to strengthen the nature of annual paid leave as a guaranteed vacation. If this regulation is interpreted literally, all employees who have continuously worked for less than one year or who have worked less than 80 percentage of one year one paid-leave day for each month during which they have continuously worked.
The Ministry of Employment and Labor‘s Guidelines explain that employees who have continuously worked for less than one year take one day of annual paid leave every month of work in the relevant year. The Ministry of Employment and Labor explains that the employees who worked less than 80 percentage of one year were granted one day of annual paid leave per month which they have continuously worked, not every month of the year, the previous year, that is, they worked less than 80 percentage. The reason for this unreasonable interpretation of the Ministry of Employment and Labor‘s Guidelinesis is that annual paid leave is recognized as a compensatory vacation rather than a guaranteed vacation. This interpretation of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, if applied in practice, leads to quite unfair conclusions and goes against the general principles of legal interpretation.
Therefore, I suggest that the Ministry of Employment and Labor should change its interpretation of Guidelines to suit the contents of the legal regulations, Article 60-(2) of the Labor Standards Act. And, I also suggested that it is desirable to amend the Labor Standards Act like other major foreign countries to ease the requirements for receiving annual paid leave to prevent problems with the interpretation of this provision.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 1년간 80퍼센트 미만 출근자에 대한 행정해석의 태도
Ⅲ. 고용노동부 행정해석의 문제점
Ⅳ. 근로기준법 제60조 제2항의 올바른 해석과 입법적 보완 방향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-360-000035122