메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
심재한 (영남대학교)
저널정보
한국경쟁법학회 경쟁법연구 경쟁법연구 제43권
발행연도
2021.1
수록면
209 - 232 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Article 11 (2) of the revised Korea Antimonopoly and Fair Trade Act, which takes effect from December 30, 2021, introduced the thresholds based notification standards for merger control as follows. ① The total amount of the value paid or invested in return for a merger must be equal to or greater than the amount prescribed by Presidential Decree. ② The merged company shall operate at a considerable level as prescribed by Presidential Decree in Korea. According to the revised law, even if other companies' assets or sales fall short of KRW 30 billion, the amount of transactions is more than a certain standard, and if they operate at a significant level in the domestic market, they will be obliged to notify. German Competition Act (GWB) and the Austrian Cartel and Competition Law Amendment Act 2017 (KaWeRAG) introduced a system based on the consideration of the opposing payments paid for merger to reduce defects in the regulation. Section 35 (1a) GWB and Section 9 (4) of the Austrian Cartel Act 2005 (KartG) close a gap in the system of merger control so that it is able to perform its function to the fullest extent in an increasingly dynamic economic environment. The practical problem with the introduction of the transaction amount-based merger notification standard under the Korea Antimonopoly and Fair Trade Act is how much the transaction amount, which is the notification standard, will be set. In this paper, the implications of the introduction of the transaction amount-based merger notification system in Korea will be examined.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0