메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김효성 (법무법인 화우)
저널정보
한국경쟁법학회 경쟁법연구 경쟁법연구 제42권
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
120 - 146 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article mainly focused on explaining the details of the Legal Professional Privilege(“LPP”), which is recently introduced in the competition law procedure of Japan, and looking at the implications that should be considered when the LPP is introduced in South Korea. The new LPP system in Japan has a similar form to the EU competition law with respect to its content and procedures. Although the scope of the LPP is limited to cases related to cartels, the introduction of the LPP is important since Japan was one of the few countries where the LPP was not recognized. The Supreme Court of South Korea explicitly denied the LPP in 2012, but there is ample need for the exchange of legal communication between an attorney and client to be recognized as a secret as part of the right to defend in the competition law procedure in Korea. After the introduction of LPP in Japan, South Korea become the only OECD member country that denies the LPP in competition law. Thus, it is necessary to recognize the LPP in the competition law enforcement system as soon as possible. Regarding the specifics of the LPP, the discussion could be based on the content of the LPP system in the EU and Japan.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0