지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第158輯
- 발행연도
- 2021.6
- 수록면
- 159 - 198 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.18622/kher.2021.06.158.159
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examined the way in which the Qing dynasty had introduced the diplomatic office system through unequal treaties and the Western international law books and figured out the relevance between Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea and Sino-Korean modern diplomacy. In particular, this article paid attention to the manifestation that rationality and empireness of the diplomatic offices appeared and the aspect that the traditional diplomacy and modern diplomacy competed.
Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea can be explained in terms of rationality and empireness, and the change of Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea can be divided into the following two periods. The first phase is the founding period of the Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea. In this period, Qing aimed at making the Chosun her vassal state through the Commercial Affair Office. Qing made use of modern diplomacy and traditional diplomacy arbitrarily. The second phase is the completing period of the Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea. In this period, the minister or consul had developed to enhance the rationality of modern diplomacy using treaties and Western international law but had to defend against Korean or Japanese empireness.
This study has the following meanings in terms of supplementation of prior research and expansion of research horizon. First, this article revealed that Qing’s empireness before the Sino-Japanese War came from both traditional diplomacy and modern diplomacy. Therefore, preceding researches that have judged Qing’s Chosun policy traditional or modern need to be reconsidered. Second, this article discovered the rationality of modern diplomacy in proceeding with Sino-Korean relations. Several preceding kinds of research did not stress the development of Sino-Korean relations. It is clear that the rationality of modern diplomacy increased at this time.
Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea can be explained in terms of rationality and empireness, and the change of Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea can be divided into the following two periods. The first phase is the founding period of the Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea. In this period, Qing aimed at making the Chosun her vassal state through the Commercial Affair Office. Qing made use of modern diplomacy and traditional diplomacy arbitrarily. The second phase is the completing period of the Qing’s diplomatic offices in Korea. In this period, the minister or consul had developed to enhance the rationality of modern diplomacy using treaties and Western international law but had to defend against Korean or Japanese empireness.
This study has the following meanings in terms of supplementation of prior research and expansion of research horizon. First, this article revealed that Qing’s empireness before the Sino-Japanese War came from both traditional diplomacy and modern diplomacy. Therefore, preceding researches that have judged Qing’s Chosun policy traditional or modern need to be reconsidered. Second, this article discovered the rationality of modern diplomacy in proceeding with Sino-Korean relations. Several preceding kinds of research did not stress the development of Sino-Korean relations. It is clear that the rationality of modern diplomacy increased at this time.
목차
1. 序言
2. 淸末 駐外公館 制度의 도입
3. 청의 駐朝鮮商務署와 近代外交의 胎動
4. 청의 駐韓公使館 · 領事館과 近代外交의 展開
5. 結語
참고문헌
참고문헌 (76)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
《七劍十三俠》的板本與幻想英雄敍事
한국중어중문학 우수논문집
2018 .11
-
The Qing’s Military Deception and Manipulation of the Qing Veritable Records: A Critical Analysis of the Records of Diplomatic Contacts on the Eve of the 1637 Qing Invasion of Joseon Korea
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2023 .12
-
병자호란 이후 倭情咨文의 전략적 의미
한일관계사연구
2015 .04
-
New Perspectives on the Study of Korean Diplomatic History: Diplomatic Documents of Korea (2009-2018) and Korea’s Foreign Relations and Diplomatic History (2019)
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2024 .06
-
조선후기 기자의 위상 변화와 조·청 외교에서의 활용 양상
국학연구
2023 .07
-
한중일 삼국의 근대국제관계 - 청일전쟁
동방학
2018 .01
-
신미양요와 청의 조선 정책
중국근현대사연구
2021 .09
-
근대 조선의 ‘탈중화’와 지역의식의 재구성
동방학
2017 .01
-
1995~2015년 명청사 연구 성과와 새로운 전망
동양사학연구
2015 .12
-
韓國內 中國 租界交涉과 中國近代外交 -駐朝鮮總領事의 租界撤廢交涉을 中心으로-
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
论“丙子之役”后朝鲜对清朝关系的实态 -以贡物变化情况为视角-
한중인문학연구
2015 .01
-
自國史의 帝國性을 묻는다 : 한중일 3국의 동아시아 지역사 비교
역사교육
2016 .03
-
중세 일본의 외교권
대동문화연구
2021 .01
-
구미 학계의 ‘청조(淸朝)’ 인식과 서술 - 『케임브리지 중국사 9권, 제2부 1800년까지의 청조』를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
淸代散文硏究的構想
中國散文硏究集刊
2016 .01
-
택당(澤堂) 이식(李植)의 명청 교체기 자타인식(自他認識)
서강인문논총
2016 .04
-
초기 대청 북경사행 기록과 사행 노정 검토
온지논총
2019 .01
-
1840-1860년대 청조의 ‘속국’ 문제에 대한 대응
중국근현대사연구
2020 .06
-
《閱微草堂筆記》에 나타난 紀昀의 新疆인식
중국소설논총
2023 .04
-
The Qing Dynasty’s Response to the Question of “Tributary States” from the 1840s to the 1860s
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2023 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-374-001865315