메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이동욱 (고려대학교)
저널정보
중국근현대사학회 중국근현대사연구 中國近現代史硏究 第86輯
발행연도
2020.6
수록면
1 - 30 (30page)
DOI
10.29323/mchina.2020.6.86.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study set out to examine changes to Qing Dynasty"s response process during conflicts between its tributary states and Western powers between the 1840s and the 1860s. Previous studies reported that modern Qing"s policy about Joseon made a shift from the non-intervention or neglect policy before the 1880s to the intervention policy or policy of reinforcing its suzerainty after the 1880s. This understanding was, however, established by most of previous studies that pivoted on the 1860s. Once the pivot is moved to the 1840s, new implications are found even based on the lack of historical materials. In the 1840s, Qing"s attitude strongly reflected its willing to act as the “Tianchao(天朝)”, which should protect its “Vassal states” within its tributary system including Joseon. In the declining process of its own power, Qing tried to stop the Western Powers from advancing to East Asia by expanding the application of its interpretations of Treaties of Nanking, Bogue, Whampoa, etc. which prohibited the entrance and trade of Western ships along the coasts except for the five trade ports to Joseon and Lewchew(Ryukyu), emphasizing that these states belonged to the Qing suzerainty. After the 2nd Opium War, however, Qing started to emphasize the autonomy of its tributary states instead of their subordination. There were a couple of reasons behind it: first, Qing allowed Westerners to travel its inland and do free missionary works, but its tributary states including Joseon still refused to accept trade and missionary works from Westerners. Unlike before, Qing felt a need to make it clear that its treaties with the West were not applied to its tributary states; and secondly, Qing wanted to avoid the possibilities of getting involved in disputes between its tributary states and Western powers such as the French invasion of Korea in 1866 when its national power was weak after the 2nd Opium War and Taiping Rebellion. In short, Qing"s insistence on its suzerainty for its tributary states changed in flexible and variable ways according to the need in the middle of changing international situations and domestic circumstances.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 「南京條約」 이후 청조의 ‘屬國’ 주장
Ⅲ. 「天津條約」과 ‘屬國自主’의 등장
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (83)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-912-001093820