지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제119호
- 발행연도
- 2021.3
- 수록면
- 51 - 85 (35page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2021.03.119.51
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Goryeo people considered the Goryeo dynasty as a state protected by all the Buddhist entities(諸佛). And in reflection of such belief, the Goryeo Kings maintained a practice of appointing both Royal and Dynastic Buddhist Masters and forming a relationship with them, in which the Goryeo King would humbly serve them as Masters and respectively ask them for their counsel. The relationship could be labeled as a Buddhist “Saja(師資)” relationship.
When institutions and systems for state governance was established, official procedures for appointments were established as well. Whoever was to receive an appointment(Chaek, 冊) would greet the emissary from the king(Chaeksa, 冊使) and have a meeting(Hwebin-eui, 會賓儀), and then submit an appreciative appeal to the King, and later visit the palace to meet the King oneself. In case of the Royal and Dynastic Masters, it was an appointment of lofty figures who would become teachers to the King and an honored elder for the entire country, so the appointees would forward a Pyomun appeal without referring to themselves as a ‘vassal(臣),’ and when they met the King in the palace, they would together with the King perform the ritual of Saja-rye(師資禮). All these modifications were to properly treat the candidates for the Masters, but at the same time it was an act of recognizing them as yet another recipients of a dynastic ritual organized by the King and government. As a result, while all these Masters enjoyed a privileged status as a counselor and special consultant to the King, they too were absorbed into the standard ritual system of the state.
The Royal Masters and Dynastic Masters were symbolic figures that show us the prominent status Buddhism maintained during the Goryeo period, but the appointment processes also show us that their authorities only functioned within the governing authority of the state and King, and was not beyond the realm of secular power. These rituals and protocols were yet another method to show that the power structure and hierarchy began with the King at the top. And they serve as an important clue for us to determine the real nature of the relationship that politics and religion have cultivated in this period.
When institutions and systems for state governance was established, official procedures for appointments were established as well. Whoever was to receive an appointment(Chaek, 冊) would greet the emissary from the king(Chaeksa, 冊使) and have a meeting(Hwebin-eui, 會賓儀), and then submit an appreciative appeal to the King, and later visit the palace to meet the King oneself. In case of the Royal and Dynastic Masters, it was an appointment of lofty figures who would become teachers to the King and an honored elder for the entire country, so the appointees would forward a Pyomun appeal without referring to themselves as a ‘vassal(臣),’ and when they met the King in the palace, they would together with the King perform the ritual of Saja-rye(師資禮). All these modifications were to properly treat the candidates for the Masters, but at the same time it was an act of recognizing them as yet another recipients of a dynastic ritual organized by the King and government. As a result, while all these Masters enjoyed a privileged status as a counselor and special consultant to the King, they too were absorbed into the standard ritual system of the state.
The Royal Masters and Dynastic Masters were symbolic figures that show us the prominent status Buddhism maintained during the Goryeo period, but the appointment processes also show us that their authorities only functioned within the governing authority of the state and King, and was not beyond the realm of secular power. These rituals and protocols were yet another method to show that the power structure and hierarchy began with the King at the top. And they serve as an important clue for us to determine the real nature of the relationship that politics and religion have cultivated in this period.
목차
머리말
1. 왕사·국사 책봉 의례의 재검토
2. 의례에 반영된 군신·사자 관계
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
조선시대 생전예수재의 설행과 의미
불교학연구
2019 .01
-
고려시대 국왕 관련 의례 연구의 성과와 제언
동방학지
2019 .01
-
조선의 冕服: 정치와 외교의 修辭
역사민속학
2022 .06
-
고려시대 상원연등회의(上元燃燈會儀) 소회일 절차의 분석과 특징
한국사상사학
2023 .04
-
고려 국왕 즉위에 관한 외교 형식의 변화와 의미
역사문화연구
2023 .05
-
1898년 독립협회의 정치기획과 ‘충군애국(忠君愛國)’
역사와현실
2018 .03
-
高麗齋醮研究
도교문화연구
2017 .05
-
고려전기 宣麻儀의 구성과 의례 검토
史叢(사총)
2019 .01
-
『고려사』 기록에 보이는 불교적인 대외교류의 공간적 범위와 성격
석당논총
2024 .03
-
고려후기 사여관복(賜與冠服) 행례와 예제(禮制) 질서의 형성
역사와현실
2020 .12
-
고려시대사 석박사 학위논문의 추이와 대학원 교육— 2000년~2021년 학위논문을 중심으로 —
사림
2022 .10
-
韓日古代「龍王」銘木簡再論
동서인문
2024 .08
-
인도의 불교의례와 그 변용
불교문예연구
2019 .01
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
고려 인종 원년(1123) 설행 대송 외교의례의 구성과 특징
역사와현실
2021 .03
-
『碧巖錄』 ‘是什麽’의 用處에 관한 一考
禪學(선학)
2019 .01
-
고려 무신집권기 왕권과 의례 - 왕실 조상 숭배의례를 중심으로 -
석당논총
2021 .01
-
「『高麗圖經』 譯註」(3) : 권2 「世次」편의 분석을 중심으로
한국사학보
2017 .05
-
사무엘상 8장 11-17절의 ‘왕의 권리’ : 왕의 정당한 권리를 이야기하는 글
구약논단
2017 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-911-001648886