지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제191집
- 발행연도
- 2020.12
- 수록면
- 133 - 173 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2020.12.191.133
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Juhyeon-gun consisted of five units: Boseung-gun(保勝軍), Jeongyong-gun(精勇軍), Ilpum-gun(一品軍), Yipum-gun(二品軍), and Sampum-gun(三品軍). The size of each unit of Juhyeon-gun was approximately equal to the ratio of Boseung-gun:Jeongyong -gun:Ilpum-gun≒8,600:20,000:20,000.
In consideration of the following aspects, this study investigated which units were elite troops out of Boseung-gun and Jeongyong -gun in Juhyeon-gun. First, the number of Boseung-gun was recorded first in the historical materials in which the number of troops in Juhyeon-gun was written by region, followed by that of Jeongyong-gun and Ilpum-gun. Second, right after the formation of the Byeolmuban(別武班), King Sukjong(肅宗) inspected only Boseung- gun, excluding Jeongyong-gun. These two facts illustrate that Boseung-gun was a more elite force than Jeongyong-gun. Ma-gun was treated one grade higher than Bo-gun in both Gaejeong Jeonsigwa(改定田柴科) and Gyeongjeong Jeonsigwa(更定田柴科), indicating that Ma-gun was a more elite force than Bo-gun at the time.
In the two years of King Wu(禑王)"s reign, the proportion of cavalry and infantrymen was approximately 3:16. In Juhyeon-gun, the proportionate relationship between the number of troops of the Boseung-gun and the sum total number of Jeongyong-gun and Ilgum-gun, i.e. the proportion of the Boseung-gun and Jeongyong -gun+Ilgum-gun was 8,000:40,000, which has a ratio of 1:5. It shows that the two cases are almost identical in the proportional relationship between cavalry and foot soldiers.
Given that Ma-gun is treated one grade lower than Daejeong(隊正), the lowest-ranking commander in both Gaejeong Jeonsigwa and Gyeongjeong Jeonsigwa, it is clear that Ma-gun is an ordinary soldier. In Gaejeong Jeonsigwa, Ma-gun received the same level of treatment as Sandaejeong(散隊正) and Seosa(書史), one grade higher than Tongin(通引), and in Gyeongjeong Jeonsigwa, he received one or two grades higher treatment than Seosa, Tongin, Hanin(閑人), and Jabryu(雜類).
Through these two things, it is inferred that there was a relationship between Ma-gun and Bo-gun in Jeonsigwa, and Bosung-gun, Jeongyong-gun, and Ilpum-gun in Juhyeon-gun. It is estimated that Boseung-gun in Juhyeon-gun was recorded as Ma-gun in Jeonsigwa, and Jeongyong-gun and Ilpum-gun in Juhyeon-gun as Bo-gun in Jeonsigwa.
Boseung-gun in Juhyeon-gun was from the upper class of self-reliant farmers, while Jeongyong-gun and Ilpum-gun in Juhyeon -gun were from the middle and lower classes of self-reliant farmers.
In consideration of the following aspects, this study investigated which units were elite troops out of Boseung-gun and Jeongyong -gun in Juhyeon-gun. First, the number of Boseung-gun was recorded first in the historical materials in which the number of troops in Juhyeon-gun was written by region, followed by that of Jeongyong-gun and Ilpum-gun. Second, right after the formation of the Byeolmuban(別武班), King Sukjong(肅宗) inspected only Boseung- gun, excluding Jeongyong-gun. These two facts illustrate that Boseung-gun was a more elite force than Jeongyong-gun. Ma-gun was treated one grade higher than Bo-gun in both Gaejeong Jeonsigwa(改定田柴科) and Gyeongjeong Jeonsigwa(更定田柴科), indicating that Ma-gun was a more elite force than Bo-gun at the time.
In the two years of King Wu(禑王)"s reign, the proportion of cavalry and infantrymen was approximately 3:16. In Juhyeon-gun, the proportionate relationship between the number of troops of the Boseung-gun and the sum total number of Jeongyong-gun and Ilgum-gun, i.e. the proportion of the Boseung-gun and Jeongyong -gun+Ilgum-gun was 8,000:40,000, which has a ratio of 1:5. It shows that the two cases are almost identical in the proportional relationship between cavalry and foot soldiers.
Given that Ma-gun is treated one grade lower than Daejeong(隊正), the lowest-ranking commander in both Gaejeong Jeonsigwa and Gyeongjeong Jeonsigwa, it is clear that Ma-gun is an ordinary soldier. In Gaejeong Jeonsigwa, Ma-gun received the same level of treatment as Sandaejeong(散隊正) and Seosa(書史), one grade higher than Tongin(通引), and in Gyeongjeong Jeonsigwa, he received one or two grades higher treatment than Seosa, Tongin, Hanin(閑人), and Jabryu(雜類).
Through these two things, it is inferred that there was a relationship between Ma-gun and Bo-gun in Jeonsigwa, and Bosung-gun, Jeongyong-gun, and Ilpum-gun in Juhyeon-gun. It is estimated that Boseung-gun in Juhyeon-gun was recorded as Ma-gun in Jeonsigwa, and Jeongyong-gun and Ilpum-gun in Juhyeon-gun as Bo-gun in Jeonsigwa.
Boseung-gun in Juhyeon-gun was from the upper class of self-reliant farmers, while Jeongyong-gun and Ilpum-gun in Juhyeon -gun were from the middle and lower classes of self-reliant farmers.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 주현군의 구성과 병력 수
Ⅲ. 주현군과 전시과(田柴科)의 마군(馬軍), 보군(步軍)의 관계
Ⅳ. 주현군의 사회 계층적 실체
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (34)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[만만한 한국사] 고려의 토지제도, 전시과
유레카
2024 .01
-
근대시기 영산강 유역(담양군과 화순군) 면직물 생산 문화의 특징: 섬진강 유역의 구례군과의 비교를 중심으로
복식문화연구
2016 .08
-
고려 전시과의 전개와 지급기준의 변화
한국사학보
2018 .11
-
한국사에서의 漢四郡 認識
고조선단군학
2022 .04
-
신라 문소군, 숭선군의 구조와 군현 편성 원리
한국학논집
2019 .03
-
연산군과 광해군 최후의 장면
문학치료연구
2018 .01
-
1920년대 조선의 군제(郡制) 논의와 조선총독부의 ‘군도제(郡島制)’ 구상
역사와현실
2025 .03
-
1914년 전후의 논산군 행정 구획 및 지명 변화 연구
어문연구
2022 .03
-
｢『高麗圖經』 譯註｣(12) -권12, ｢仗衛二｣편과 권13, ｢兵器｣편의 분석을 중심으로-
한국사학보
2019 .11
-
일제강점기 총기 규제 정책 연구
사림
2021 .10
-
[미술] 잊을 수 없는, 기억하는 : 제주 4·3 70주년 전시들
황해문화
2018 .06
-
신라 상주 및 화령군의 공간 구조 복원
한국고대사연구
2022 .12
-
고려 전시과의 성격 - 분급토지와 분급대상을 중심으로 -
역사와 담론
2020 .10
-
만세시위의 다원적 의미와 지속되는 지역공동체 - 안성군 3.1운동의 새로운 이해 -
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
원간섭기 토지분급제도의 양상과 특징
역사와경계
2023 .04
-
함포(艦砲)의 배치를 중심으로 본 이순신 거북선의 구조 연구
한국과학사학회지
2018 .01
-
연산군대 금표 설치와 경기의 농산물 유통
역사와현실
2021 .09
-
日本列島に設置された百済郡・新羅郡・高麗郡について
일본학보
2022 .11
-
‘就是’의 의미 분석
중국어문논총
2015 .04
-
사제로서의 단군과 무당의 역할 연구
仙道文化
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-911-001436119