메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김동천 (조선대학교) 박도헌 (조선대학교)
저널정보
한국발육발달학회 한국발육발달학회지 한국발육발달학회지 제28권 제4호
발행연도
2020.11
수록면
585 - 602 (18page)
DOI
10.34284/KJGD.2020.11.28.4.585

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study explores the factors of rapport that improve the efficiency of coaching between handball coaches and players. Also, It searches how the rapport affects players’ performance on games, and indicates the causal relationship between the variables. The factors will be able to create the rapport which can be offered as a basic materials of handball courts. In this study, the factors of rapport that improve the efficiency of coaching were derived from the guidance methods of players’ subjective opinions. For this purpose, preliminary questions were extracted through two processes, and then the final 33 questions of Q statement were extracted by confirming the appropriateness and validity. Based on the final questions, 38 handball players from university and business teams in G city were selected as P-Sample. Since none of the questions were answered undependably, all 38 subjects were forced to be classified into Q-Sorting Chart according to the Q-Sorting classification method, and the scores given in the sorting distribution chart were coded in numerical order of Q samples. Principal Factor Analysis was performed through QUANL program. The result of this process is as follows: First, The result was analyzed on the factors that showed positive and negative consent for Type I, Type II and Type III. Second, the result of positive and negative differences was confirmed through analyzing the differences between two types. Third, the result of positive and negative consents was indicated from the matched items between types. The result of these analyses is as follows:

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-692-000084533