지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제117호
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 257 - 299 (43page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.09.117.257
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The authors of this article visited the Tae’an-sa monastery in December 2019, and confirmed the existence of the original main stone(“Momdol, body stone”) of the Stone tablet for Master Jeog’in (Jeog’in Seonsa), which is recorded to have been first erected in 872. It has been a general belief that the artifact does not remain today, but we beg to differ. In this article we report the results of our survey while also discussing two issues related to this artifact.
The inscription of this tablet supposedly included a record known as ‘Bimal (碑末),’ which documents the properties of the Tae’an-sa monastery (including the land it owned). The record itself has been considered an invaluable source of information concerning the socio-economic reality of the ending days of Shilla. Yet the tablet itself was never found, so whether or not ‘Bimal’ was really part of this tablet has been a constant object of debate.
Meanwhile, a new tablet which was erected in 1928 to replace the original Jeog’in Seonsa tablet features a ‘Dragon head(Isu, 螭首),’ which itself was entangled in a rumor that it was originally from the Gwangja Daesa-bi tablet. Several studies explored such possibility but a definite answer to the rumor was never given. Yet the newly confirmed Jeog’in Seonsa-bi tablet seems like it would be able to provide the aforementioned two questions with an adequate answer.
Our inspection of the tablet led us to believe that the ‘Bimal’ record would have been at the left end portion of the front side of the Jeog’in Seonsa-bi tablet. It seems like it was the intention of the creators to protect the properties and land owned by the monastery in a turbulent time (at the end of the Shilla dynasty no less), by clarifying the monastery’s rights over those assets specifically on the tablet.
Meanwhile, the dragon head placed on the newly built Jeog’in Seonsa-bi tablet seems to have been indeed from the Gwangja Daesa-bi tablet. And another dragon head that is right beside the Gwangja Daesa-bi tablet seems to be from another entirely different stone tablet.
The inscription of this tablet supposedly included a record known as ‘Bimal (碑末),’ which documents the properties of the Tae’an-sa monastery (including the land it owned). The record itself has been considered an invaluable source of information concerning the socio-economic reality of the ending days of Shilla. Yet the tablet itself was never found, so whether or not ‘Bimal’ was really part of this tablet has been a constant object of debate.
Meanwhile, a new tablet which was erected in 1928 to replace the original Jeog’in Seonsa tablet features a ‘Dragon head(Isu, 螭首),’ which itself was entangled in a rumor that it was originally from the Gwangja Daesa-bi tablet. Several studies explored such possibility but a definite answer to the rumor was never given. Yet the newly confirmed Jeog’in Seonsa-bi tablet seems like it would be able to provide the aforementioned two questions with an adequate answer.
Our inspection of the tablet led us to believe that the ‘Bimal’ record would have been at the left end portion of the front side of the Jeog’in Seonsa-bi tablet. It seems like it was the intention of the creators to protect the properties and land owned by the monastery in a turbulent time (at the end of the Shilla dynasty no less), by clarifying the monastery’s rights over those assets specifically on the tablet.
Meanwhile, the dragon head placed on the newly built Jeog’in Seonsa-bi tablet seems to have been indeed from the Gwangja Daesa-bi tablet. And another dragon head that is right beside the Gwangja Daesa-bi tablet seems to be from another entirely different stone tablet.
목차
머리말
1. 새로 세운 비와 뒤바뀐 이수
2. 쓰러진 옛 비와 ‘비말’의 기록
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
태안사 적인선사비의 사본 계통과 비문 교정 - ‘碑末’의 기록과 관련하여 -
목간과문자
2023 .06
-
百濟 法華信仰과 占察懺悔 : 부여 능산리사지 ‘宿世結業’ 목간을 중심으로
한국고대사연구
2018 .12
-
서양 고대와 중세의 테블릿형 기록 매체: 연구 동향을 중심으로
서양사연구
2021 .11
-
일본 고대목간의 형식 분류와 기능적 분류
목간과문자
2022 .12
-
용도로 본 통일신라 목간의 서풍
한국학논집
2015 .12
-
고려 침몰선 출수 목간의 제작과 작성에 대한 연구(1)- 목간 필적과 제작의 동일성 검토를 중심으로 -
해양문화재
2021 .12
-
함안 성산산성 제17차 발굴조사 출토 목간 자료 검토
목간과문자
2017 .06
-
조선시대 磁器製 器物形 誌石 연구
석당논총
2015 .01
-
함안 성산산성 출토 목간의 제작 유형과 제작 단위
목간과문자
2021 .06
-
부여 지역 백제 목간의 발굴 현황과 분포
목간과문자
2023 .06
-
나주 복암리 목간 출토의 고고학적 의의
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2016 .01
-
신 출토 월성 해자 목간의 재검토
신라사학보
2024 .12
-
백제 부여목간과 나주목간의 서풍
목간과문자
2020 .06
-
고대 동아시아 서예자료와 월성 해자 목간
목간과문자
2018 .06
-
태안해역 출토 목간의 어학적 특징
목간과문자
2017 .12
-
신라 문서목간의 話者와 書者
신라사학보
2021 .04
-
신라왕경 출토 목간의 수종분석 현황과 보존처리
목간과문자
2024 .06
-
동아시아의 典籍交流와 『論語』 목간
목간과문자
2020 .06
-
出土資料를 통한 秦代 社會의 새로운 이해 -<<秦簡牘硏究(第1-5冊)>>(陳偉 主編, 武漢大學出版社, 2016)를 중심으로
중국사연구
2019 .01
-
사진 이미지분석을 통한 문자해독과 목간사진 촬영을 위한 제안
목간과문자
2020 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0