지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第152輯
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 321 - 360 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2020.9.152.321
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines the definition, origin and transitions of the court rituals in the Persian-Islamic world. “Kissing the Ground(Zamīnbūs),” “Scattering Coins (Nithār),” “Bestowing Robes of Honour(Khila’),” “Present or Tribute(Pishkash)” are the old court rituals in Persian-Islamic world. The origin of those rituals are different from each other. For example, “Kissing the Ground” comes from Assyrian Empire of Mesopotamia, “Scattering Coins” from Indo-Persian ancient culture, “Robes of Honour” from all around the Middle East. But these different rituals, altogether started to form a set of court protocols at least early in the 11<SUP>th</SUP> century in the court of the Ghaznavid dynasty. And according to the Persian sources, it seemed to have lasted until the Qajar dynasty in 19<SUP>th</SUP> century.
But according to the non-Persian sources such as autobiography of Mongol-Turkic rulers, traveler’s note of Spanish and Chinese embassies, we can find some other court rituals that are different from those written in Persian. Non-Persian writings described some different court rituals, especially Kowtow. It is originated from Mongols steppe, and spreaded out in Central Asia and further during the Mongol empire. Thus, two different traditions of court rituals seemed to have coincides in the Timurid court, but actually Mongol rituals prevailed over the Persian-Islamic rituals though it remained in collateral rituals such as banquet rituals.
Mongol rituals remained even after the fall of Timurid empire, so during the Safavid and Qajar dynasties there are several influences of Mongol rituals in their court rituals. However, these Mongol ritual later mingled with previous Persian-Islamic ones and formed a different forms of court protocols.
This article also examines that the descriptions of several court rituals written in historical materials can be different from each other depending on the writer"s cultural background. When Persian historians of the Timurid empire described the court rituals, they usually wrote similar to what their predecessor had written. It is their custom of historical presentation. It is likely to be the same for Mongol-Turkic historians, but descriptions of their rituals are similar to that of foreign observers like envoys and travelers. Thus, this analysis also provides insight on evaluating the reliability of the source.
But according to the non-Persian sources such as autobiography of Mongol-Turkic rulers, traveler’s note of Spanish and Chinese embassies, we can find some other court rituals that are different from those written in Persian. Non-Persian writings described some different court rituals, especially Kowtow. It is originated from Mongols steppe, and spreaded out in Central Asia and further during the Mongol empire. Thus, two different traditions of court rituals seemed to have coincides in the Timurid court, but actually Mongol rituals prevailed over the Persian-Islamic rituals though it remained in collateral rituals such as banquet rituals.
Mongol rituals remained even after the fall of Timurid empire, so during the Safavid and Qajar dynasties there are several influences of Mongol rituals in their court rituals. However, these Mongol ritual later mingled with previous Persian-Islamic ones and formed a different forms of court protocols.
This article also examines that the descriptions of several court rituals written in historical materials can be different from each other depending on the writer"s cultural background. When Persian historians of the Timurid empire described the court rituals, they usually wrote similar to what their predecessor had written. It is their custom of historical presentation. It is likely to be the same for Mongol-Turkic historians, but descriptions of their rituals are similar to that of foreign observers like envoys and travelers. Thus, this analysis also provides insight on evaluating the reliability of the source.
목차
서론
1. 페르시아어 사료 속 군주 알현 의식의 유래
2. 몽골리아 초원에서 유래한 몽골제국의 跪拜 의식
3. 티무르조 군주 알현 의식의 실제와 그 이후
결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (58)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선시대 생전예수재의 설행과 의미
불교학연구
2019 .01
-
조선총독부 제정 「의례준칙」의 보급과 시행실태
민속학연구
2016 .12
-
立大木·솟대 祭儀의 등장과 전개에 대한 試論
한국고고학보
2018 .01
-
신라의 희생제의
사림
2018 .01
-
의례설행과 수행인식의 접점―수행의례 연구를 중심으로
불교문예연구
2019 .01
-
조선 초기 王室祖上儀禮의 유교적 정비
한국사학보
2017 .02
-
朝鮮初期 國家儀禮 정비의 지향과 원칙- 吉禮·凶禮의 상호 영향을 중심으로-
민족문화연구
2015 .01
-
Buddhist Ontology and Miniaturization : Enacting Ritual with Nonhuman Agency
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2017 .12
-
고려시대 국왕 관련 의례 연구의 성과와 제언
동방학지
2019 .01
-
고려전기 宣麻儀의 구성과 의례 검토
史叢(사총)
2019 .01
-
The Politics of Rituals in Early Qing: Manchu-Mongol Relations through Rituals
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2020 .12
-
唐의 祀典 체계와 신라의 祀典 정비
신라사학보
2019 .04
-
高麗齋醮研究
도교문화연구
2017 .05
-
인도의 불교의례와 그 변용
불교문예연구
2019 .01
-
마니산 참성단 도교의례 음식의 역사적 맥락과 형태
도교문화연구
2021 .11
-
고려시대 제사유적과 산천제 : 월출산 유적과 부안 죽막동 유적을 중심으로
한국사연구
2016 .12
-
고구려 軍事儀禮 연구를 위한 提言
신라사학보
2024 .12
-
『家禮疾書』와 『星湖禮式』의 역사성
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
고대인도 제식에서 물의 다양한 역할
인도철학
2019 .01
-
明代 儀禮와의 비교를 통해 본 조선시대 俗祭의 성격
동아시아고대학
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0