메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
고훈 (미국 풀러신학교)
저널정보
연세대학교 한국기독교문화연구소 신학논단 신학논단 제101집
발행연도
2020.9
수록면
7 - 37 (31page)
DOI
10.17301/tf.2020.09.101.7

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
R. J. Thomas’s Death is one of the heated debates in Korean Christian history. Professional historians insist that Thomas was executed during his imperialistic missions. Conversely, Korean church historians argue that Thomas died a martyr during his mission work abroad. They do not yield an inch on the matter. Nevertheless, many researchers have not paid much attention to studies on the understanding/reconciling of the two arguments. The purpose of this paper is to understand the martyrdom theory of church historian and the Execution theory of professional historian Since 2000 and to seek the Contact Points of the Two in the debate on R. J. Thomas’s death. To achieve this, I will follow these procedures: First, section two focuses on Kyu-Moo Han, a representative historian who argues that Thomas was not martyred and Thomas’ martyrdom is a beautiful story and Yong-Kyu Park, a representative church historian who claims that Thomas was martyred. Moreover, I will explore why they argued like that by answering three questions: 1) who are they? 2) what communities do they belong to? and 3) which situations did they argued like that? Second, section three seeks the Contact Points of the Two through studies on postmodern history, public theology, and faith/scholarship of the American Christian historiography. In section four, I will organize the contents thus far and suggests an opinion about the debate/this paper’s strengths and weaknesses. The Contribution of this paper relates to reflecting on the two competing arguments and providing a beginning of reconciliation and harmony in the debate on R. J. Thomas’ death.

목차

I. 들어가는 글
II. 2000년대 이후 토마스 죽음에 대한 논쟁: 한규무와 박용규의 주장 이해
III. 한규무와 박용규의 주장 사이의 접점 모색
IV. 나가는 글
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (52)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-230-001294711