메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Historical View of Suematsu Yasukazu(末松保和) through The Rise and Fall of Mimana (任那興亡史)
Recommendations
Search
Questions

『임나흥망사』를 통해 본 스에마츠 야스카즈의 역사관

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jeong Dongjun (성균관대학교)
Journal
Yuksabipyungsa Critical Review of History Wn.132 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2020.8
Pages
329 - 362 (34page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2020.08.132.329

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Historical View of Suematsu Yasukazu(末松保和) through The Rise and Fall of Mimana (任那興亡史)
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
In this article, as a characteristic of positive historiography, we presents a history book based on conventional wisdom, and analyzes how it appears in The Rise and Fall of Mimana(任那興亡史) written by Suematsu Yasukazu (末松保和), In addition to the positive historiography as a methodology, we found out what his historical view was like. In short, it is as follows. Although Suematsu’s conventional wisdom, which was revealed in the unproven descriptions of The Rise and Fall of Mimana, was based on the premise of Japan’s dominance over Baekje and Silla, and a huge Yamato regime which ruled the entire Japanese archipelago. It was as well as the limitations of the contemporary historical community, more likely to be the result of the reflection to the perception about Japan and Joseon during the Japanese colonial period, and the influence of the managing Southern Korea theory(南鮮經營說). Other than that, some of the effects of the theory of heteronomy were also revealed, and there were signs that seemed to have directly reflected modern diplomatic relations into ancient diplomatic relations. In the end, such historical view of Suematsu was simply a result of being faithful to quellenkritik and substantiation, but rather a result of being overly faithful to the contemporary conventional wisdom.

Contents

1. 머리말
2. 실증사학의 특징과 식민주의 역사학
3. 『임나흥망사』에 보이는 증명 없는 서술
4. ‘통념’을 통해 분석한 스에마츠의 역사관
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

References (33)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.