지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2023.9
- 수록면
- 27 - 43 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2023.9.99.27
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To dismantle the European conception of Asia is to dismantle the modern nation-state (capitalism) and modern historiography (universal history). Wang Hui proposes multiple modernity as a way to overcome the modernity of Western-centrism. In doing so, he problematizes the modern nation-state and capitalism created by the West and proposes as an alternative to the transsystem society (imperial system) based on traditional empire and Chinese civilization. At the same time, it seeks to break down the idea of Asia created by Europe and reshape world history as a civilized empire centered on China. Thus, as the title of this book suggests, Asia (China-centric) can become the world (Universal). Through the glorification of traditional empires and the critique of the modern nation-state, Wang Hui reverses the state-empire dualism created by Europe. It problematizes the modernity created by Europe, such as the modern nation-state (capitalism), teleological/progressive views of history, and Asian conceptions, and finds an alternative modernity in traditional empires.
Postmodernism advocates the dismantling of the “modern nation-state” paradigm, but historians still emphasize “continuity” rather than “disconnection” of the nation-state. Wang Hui sees the nation-state as an outgrowth of the “modern” West that gives rise to imperialism, but the empire as a system in which multi-ethnic people coexist. In doing so, he sees all ethnic minorities and conflicts in Taiwan as being caused by nationalism, and there were no problems in the empire. As a result, he overlooks issues such as “ethnic” conflicts in the pre-modern period and simplifies the nation-state to something that did not exist in the pre-modern period. It also criticizes the imperialism (colonialism) caused by the nation-state (capitalism) while overlooking the imperialism (coloniality) of the pre-modern era. However, neither the imperialism of empires nor the imperialism of modern nation-states exist as hegemony in the surrounding region.
Finally, Wang Hui criticizes the unitary ethnic composition of the nation-state, but is not wary of the totalitarianization of the political community of the nation-state, which is another aspect of the nation-state. However, the absolutization of the theory of popular sovereignty and the emphasis on the theory of civilization are often the main drivers of fascism in the nation-state, and therefore it is necessary to problematize this as well. Through the revival of study abroad as a new universal, an empire or a civilized state (the coexistence of various ideas as well as studying abroad) is proposed, but Western imperialists have also colonized the surrounding area with the mission of civilization. It is questionable whether there is any difference between the civilizations of empires and nation-state imperialism.
Postmodernism advocates the dismantling of the “modern nation-state” paradigm, but historians still emphasize “continuity” rather than “disconnection” of the nation-state. Wang Hui sees the nation-state as an outgrowth of the “modern” West that gives rise to imperialism, but the empire as a system in which multi-ethnic people coexist. In doing so, he sees all ethnic minorities and conflicts in Taiwan as being caused by nationalism, and there were no problems in the empire. As a result, he overlooks issues such as “ethnic” conflicts in the pre-modern period and simplifies the nation-state to something that did not exist in the pre-modern period. It also criticizes the imperialism (colonialism) caused by the nation-state (capitalism) while overlooking the imperialism (coloniality) of the pre-modern era. However, neither the imperialism of empires nor the imperialism of modern nation-states exist as hegemony in the surrounding region.
Finally, Wang Hui criticizes the unitary ethnic composition of the nation-state, but is not wary of the totalitarianization of the political community of the nation-state, which is another aspect of the nation-state. However, the absolutization of the theory of popular sovereignty and the emphasis on the theory of civilization are often the main drivers of fascism in the nation-state, and therefore it is necessary to problematize this as well. Through the revival of study abroad as a new universal, an empire or a civilized state (the coexistence of various ideas as well as studying abroad) is proposed, but Western imperialists have also colonized the surrounding area with the mission of civilization. It is questionable whether there is any difference between the civilizations of empires and nation-state imperialism.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 민족국가와 역사학
Ⅲ. 제국과 제국주의
Ⅳ. 근대 국민국가: 문명론과 인민주권론
Ⅴ. 결어
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
杭州龍華寺供奉傅翕靈骨舍利考
동아인문학
2018 .06
-
『삼국지』의 ‘海賊’기사 검토
인문사회과학연구
2018 .01
-
일본(日本) 천황가(天皇家)의 발상지(發祥地)와 소위 천손(天孫)이 내려간 남구주(南九州)의 한국(『韓國』)에 대하여
국어국문학
2018 .12
-
箕子전승의 형성과 단군 신화에의 편입 과정
한국사학보
2016 .11
-
칠성과 부군(府君) 신앙, 뱀 신앙
비교민속학
2015 .12
-
서평 : 『일본 속의 百濟』
백제학보
2019 .01
-
주체 사관에서 인민과 민족의 자리
역사비평
2022 .08
-
연행로의 지리(地理)와 심적(心跡) -산해관(山海關)～통주(通州) 구간
국문학연구
2017 .01
-
식민사관 비판론의 등장과 내재적 발전론의 형성
사학연구
2017 .03
-
Two Memories, Two Historiographies
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
한국어와 일본어 표준어, 한국어 제주방언과 전라남도방언 종조사의 출현양상과 정보관리기능
국어문학
2022 .07
-
李白의 自薦 書信
중국문화연구
2016 .02
-
9세기 신라・일본해적의 연대와 일본정부의 대응
일본어문학
2015 .01
-
실증사학의 ‘이념’ — 식민지 조선에 온 역사주의
인문논총
2019 .01
-
『임나흥망사』를 통해 본 스에마츠 야스카즈의 역사관
역사비평
2020 .08
-
제도로서의 역사학과 ‘민족서사’의 미래
역사학보
2015 .12
-
Politics of Asian Orientalism: Representation of Asian Migrant Others in Korean TV Shows
동서비교문학저널
2023 .06
-
로마의 “역사(historia)” 활용 방식에 대하여
역사교육
2019 .03
-
행주(幸州)와 덕양(德陽)의 지명 유래 관련 공간성의 어문학적 고찰
우리어문연구
2016 .01
-
16세기 말~17세기 초 朝鮮과 建州女眞의 배후 교섭과 申忠一의 역할
한국인물사연구
2016 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0