메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중국어문연구회 중국어문논총 중국어문논총 제97호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
1 - 22 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, we investigated the transition process of ‘Qilai’ construction in Chinese, particularly with emphasis on evaluative ‘Qilai’ and we have found a few facts. First, it is also valid to divide the phrase ‘Qilai’ into expressions A type and M type based on the semantic orientation of the AP, that is, we have looked from A type to M type in the modern times. Although this has already been mentioned in previous studies, they did not clearly distinguish between A and M, or discussed together. Secondly, through the example analysis of several modern literatures, we also examined syntactic commonalities and differences in the process of transition between A type and M type. Although many expressions of M type without a comma appear today, the loss of a comma, one of the characteristics of the middle construction presented by Huang & Ma(2008: 36), is not an essential element of change, and the expansion of verb scope is more important factor in transition process. Thirdly, we can see that Evaluative ‘Qilai’ has developed into a different path of subjectivity through the common stage the deletion of agent, and unlike A type, M type is based on virtual(generic) structuring of repetitive occurrence. In short, the distinction between A tyep and M type of ‘Qilai’ is historically justified, and we can see that it contains a different internal structure of A type and M type.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0