메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
동학학회 동학학보 동학학보 제53호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
201 - 242 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to hermeneutically compare the 21 Letters Incantation of Tonghak and the Lord’s Prayer of Christianity. They have their own divergent views on humanity and the sense of divinity, contingent upon their own history and culture. For it, the nature of language is first considered. Language itself is not something that saves us if we know it, but always skillful means to an end. It often works inadequate and even dangerous to its pursuit. It is because language, whatever it may be, is not reality. Recognizing such shortcomings and dangers in language helps practitioners not to fall into pitfalls of absolutizing religious words and even their understanding of religious claims to the truth. Attempting to disconnect from words, therefore, this work precipitates to see beyond the language differences and taking their underpinnings. The contents of this study is, therefore, to read religious canons from the perspective of other faith traditions. Interfaith hermeneutics helps us to look at ourselves as others see us, so that we may be able to see ourselves more clearly. The intra canonical dynamics opens new horizons to see how the religious text ultimately functions today. Going beyond their conceptual formulation, as well as their unique contingencies, however, this work explores through philological research that there are not a few convergencies between them, specifically their dual frames recognizing the deity, that is, transcendence and immanence, God and humanity, emptiness and fullness, individual and entirety. As religious prayers, they do seek the practice of their respective faiths within their mundane lives, particularly at the time of community suffering. If the Lord’s Prayer impels its devotees, who were persecuted and harassed by the Jewish mainstream, into the active engagement by self-denial and compassion toward everyday people, then the 21 Letters Incantation likewise concerns desperately pleading humans, as well as the deity who is worshipped within at the same time. In particular, sich’ ŏnchu (侍天主) characterizes God (Hanullim) as dwelling in the heart of every person, as well as the spiritual energy prevalent in the world, which is convergently assumed in both prayers, though with different language. Divinity and humanity are not disparate to each other, though not one; Humans are subsumed by God but nevertheless not subordinated. Hence, the result of this exploration is as follows: In self-negation and solidarity with suffering people, the two prayers are proffering the way to be mindful as sich’ ŏnchu and chiki (至氣) through their immediate intuitive awakening and sympathetic engagement, only if the devotees were fully inspired by the Spirit as Su-un’s chiki. This is mysteriously and richly explicated by yangtanch ŏk sinkwan (兩端的 神觀), a logic of p’ow ŏl (subsumed transcendence, 包越).
#동학 #21자 주문 #기독교 #주기도문 #언어의 속성 #포월 #包越) #양단적 신관 #兩端的 神觀).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0