지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Volume 13 Number 4
- 발행연도
- 2010.12
- 수록면
- 73 - 103 (31page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The erection of the Baekdusan Boundary Stone that demarcated the border between the two countries was not based on any clear exchange of opinions between the two sides as to whom Baekdusan belonged. While the southern part of Baekdusan fell within Joseon’s sphere of activity, the northern side was occupied by Qing. Despite this reality, the issue of who possessed sovereignty over Baekdusan was never clearly resolved. In Joseon, Baekdusan was traditionally perceived as the source of Korea’s mountains and rivers and identified as an object of worship. The symbolic significance granted to the mountain was further strengthened following the erection of the boundary stone. Shortly thereafter, Joseon began to once again hold ritual ceremonies for the mountain, which was now identified as the point of origin of the royal family. A similar phenomenon also emerged during the Qing dynasty. Thus, the two kingdoms undertook the process of heightening the symbolism attached to this disputed space in a similar manner. Joseon intellectuals’ interest in Baekdusan was expanded to include the desire to gain firsthand knowledge and investigate the famed mountain. The actual location of the Boundary Stone and the issue of the territorial jurisdiction over Baekdusan were largely ignored in favor of a new approach in which the boundary between the two kingdoms was perceived as being located at the top of Baekdusan. Moreover, in some cases, Baekdusan was perceived as falling entirely within Joseon’s territory. This perception was further strengthened after the modern era, and linked to the upgrading of Baekdusan’s status and the expansion of its symbolism.
목차
Introduction
Changes in the Notion of Jurisdiction
Implementation of Ritual Ceremonies at Baekdusan
Expansion of the Interest and Exploration of Baekdusan
Conclusion
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The People of Joseon’s Perception of Baekdusan Viewed through Geographical Materials
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .12
-
Travel to Baekdusan and its Significance during the Joseon Period
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .12
-
중국·남북한의 백두산 연구와 귀속권 논리
한국사학보
2013 .05
-
Korean Intellectuals’ Perceptions of Baekdusan and the Historical Significance Thereof : Focusing on Travelogues Produced during the 1920s and 1930s
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .12
-
Westerners’ Perceptions of Baekdusan until the Nineteenth Century : Focusing on Materials in English
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .12
-
The Significance of Perceptions of Baekdusan in Baekdu-related Myths
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .12
-
조선 영조대 백두산제 시행 논쟁 : 참여 인물의 주장을 중심으로
한국인물사연구
2011 .03
-
조기천 ？백두산？ 연구의 선결문제
한국문학논총
2005 .01
-
Descriptions of the Baekdusan and the Surrounding Area in Russian and German Travel Accounts
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2010 .12
-
백두산 관광을 통해 본 식민지 ‘진정성’의 구성 방식 : 1920-30년대 민태원, 최남선, 안재홍의 백두산 기행문을 중심으로
동악어문학
2017 .05
-
Joseon and Her People Shown in the Travel Report of Campbell in the Late 19th Century
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2008 .03
-
조기천의 『백두산』과 개작의 정치성
우리말글
2006 .04
-
일제강점기 조선인 관료의 백두산 여행과 간도 인식 : 『백두산유람록』을 중심으로
장서각
2010 .10
-
일제강점기 대종교인 成世英의 백두산 여행과 영토의식 : 「遊白頭山紀行錄」을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
언어경관 ‘백두산/장백산’의 사용 양상과 사회적 요인과의 상관성 : 시각/음성 경관을 중심으로
우리말글
2017 .12
-
張志淵의 北方疆域 인식 : 『大韓疆域考』의 「白頭山定界碑考」를 중심으로
한국독립운동사연구
2005 .12
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
18세기 滿洲族 淸과 朝鮮의 交流
동양사학연구
2017 .09
-
1930년대 과학교양과 소년과학잡지 『백두산』
동화와 번역
2019 .01
-
Over the Mountains Are Mountains
Korea Journal
1989 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000958967