지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Volume 12 Number 3 (September 2009)
- 발행연도
- 2009.9
- 수록면
- 197 - 221 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Joseon dynasty, based on its approximate 500 year-long Gyeongguk daejeon system, maintained its two governmental features: internationally “respecting the senior state”(sadae) with China and “keeping friendship with neighboring countries”(kyorin)(Jurchin and Japan) on the one hand, while it domestically pursued respect for Confucian proprieties and conceded only relative sovereignty to the Joseon king on the other hand. This political system, however, was dismantled in 1897 following the birth of the Daehan Empire, which proclaimed itself as a self-reliant independent nation in the international community and in which unlimited sovereign authority was granted to the emperor.
How is the Daehan Empire different from the Joseon Dynasty? For this, I compared the provisions of the Daehanguk gukje(hereafter, Gukje), which was established with the birth of the Daehan Empire in 1897, with those of the Gyeongguk daejeon as follows.
First, Gukje states that the Daehan Empire is an independent empire that can make its own decisions regarding important matters of the Empire, such as the dispatch of diplomats, declarations of war, and conclusion of peace treaties. In comparison, Gyeongguk daejeon accepted a junior status to China and scrupulously observed the ritual practices of a tributary state, based on the tradition of “the respect for the senior state(sadae) diplomacy”.
Second, another point to be noted is the stipulation that grants unlimited military power to the emperor. According to the Gukje, the emperor has the command of the military and naval forces, the right of enacting and enforcing laws, and even the power to pardon (Article 6). Compared with this, the royal authority prescribed in the Gyeongguk daejeon is relative. Unlike the Gukje, according to which the emperor is supposed to assume all responsibilities from the enactment of laws to the appointment of government officials, the Gyeongguk daejeon system makes it a principle to entrust all those responsibilities to ministers.
The third difference is found in the upgrading of state rituals. Whereas the Gukjo oryeui established the norms for the state rituals at the kingdom level, the Daehan Empire raised all its state rituals to the level of those of an empire and stipulated the norms in the Daerye uigwe (Ceremony Manual for the Grand Rites). For example, the Daerye uigwe assigns to the country a different status from that specified in the Gukjo oryeui, which is a counterpart to the Gyeongguk daejeon.
How is the Daehan Empire different from the Joseon Dynasty? For this, I compared the provisions of the Daehanguk gukje(hereafter, Gukje), which was established with the birth of the Daehan Empire in 1897, with those of the Gyeongguk daejeon as follows.
First, Gukje states that the Daehan Empire is an independent empire that can make its own decisions regarding important matters of the Empire, such as the dispatch of diplomats, declarations of war, and conclusion of peace treaties. In comparison, Gyeongguk daejeon accepted a junior status to China and scrupulously observed the ritual practices of a tributary state, based on the tradition of “the respect for the senior state(sadae) diplomacy”.
Second, another point to be noted is the stipulation that grants unlimited military power to the emperor. According to the Gukje, the emperor has the command of the military and naval forces, the right of enacting and enforcing laws, and even the power to pardon (Article 6). Compared with this, the royal authority prescribed in the Gyeongguk daejeon is relative. Unlike the Gukje, according to which the emperor is supposed to assume all responsibilities from the enactment of laws to the appointment of government officials, the Gyeongguk daejeon system makes it a principle to entrust all those responsibilities to ministers.
The third difference is found in the upgrading of state rituals. Whereas the Gukjo oryeui established the norms for the state rituals at the kingdom level, the Daehan Empire raised all its state rituals to the level of those of an empire and stipulated the norms in the Daerye uigwe (Ceremony Manual for the Grand Rites). For example, the Daerye uigwe assigns to the country a different status from that specified in the Gukjo oryeui, which is a counterpart to the Gyeongguk daejeon.
목차
1. Dismantling of the Joseon Dynasty
2. Significance and Characteristics of the Gyeongguk daejeon System
3. Birth of the Daehan Empire: Its Significance and Nature
4. The Main Difference between the Joseon Dynasty and the Daehan Empire
5. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
대한제국의 생존전략과 '을사조약'
역사학보
2005 .12
-
대한제국기 『大韓禮典』의 편찬과 황제국 의례
역사와실학
2007 .12
-
대한제국기 순종의 西巡幸 연구 : 『西巡幸日記』를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2011 .03
-
대한제국과 통감부의 의학체계 구상과 전개
동방학지
2007 .01
-
朝鮮後期 英祖代 『續大典』位相의 재검토 : 「刑典」편찬을 중심으로
역사학보
2007 .06
-
韓末 活貧黨의 活動과 性格의 變化
역사와 세계
1995 .06
-
Pictorial Documentation of Court Entertainment Dance during the Daehan Empire
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .06
-
대한제국기 기생에 관한 연구사(史) 검토 및향후 연구과제
한국고전여성문학연구
2020 .01
-
1899년 韓ㆍ淸通商條約 締結과 大韓帝國
역사학보
2005 .06
-
개발주의와 국립 영상의 궤적 : 댐 건설을 중심으로
도시연구
2016 .04
-
1919년 保守儒林의 服制논쟁과 파리長書運動
역사와실학
2007 .12
-
朝鮮後期 正祖代 법제정비와 『大典通編』체제의 구현
대동문화연구
2008 .01
-
‘동아시아사로서의 한국사’를 보는 방법 : 제국과 근대국가 그리고 지역
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
조선 초기 朝儀의 의례구조와 상징
한국사연구
2007 .06
-
한국전쟁 피난민과 국제시장의 로컬리티
한국민족문화
2010 .11
-
대한제국기의 호구정책― 丹城 培養里와 濟州 德修里의 사례
대동문화연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000953417