지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제116호
- 발행연도
- 2020.6
- 수록면
- 209 - 248 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.06.116.209
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The objective of this article is to determine what kind of changes the ruling system of Goguryeo was going through (during the Pyeong’yang Capital era), by examining changes that were happening to the landscape of the Pyeong’yang capital at the time. The concept of ‘Landscape’ refers to the visual image of a certain space. However, it was not only a physical stage for human action, but a product of the human’s own social actions as well.
Since its transfer of the capital to Pyeong’yang in 427, Goguryeo had been facing certain changes in its political norms, such as the absolute authority of the king intensifying and members of the aristocratic class turning into bureaucrats. The landscape of the capital changed accordingly, which displays two distinctive features especially in the Pyeong’yeang era’s Early half: Newly established Buddhist monasteries (with high-storied pagodas at their centers) that replaced large-scale burial mounds of earlier periods which symbolized the kings’ authority, and gridded city plans (for a bureaucratic society) which replaced past castles on plain grounds that signified the power of the central aristocrats. While high pagodas manifested the transcendental nature of leaders, the gridded streets and roads represented the bureaucratic nature of the leading circle.
Next, the Pyeong’yeang era’s Latter half also featured two distinctive characteristics in the Pyeong’yang capital(the Jang’an-seong capital). The inner space of the Capital(Gyeong, 京) was divided to differentiate officials from civilians, and internal grids were supplemented with tall walls(according to the “Bangjang-je” institution). This was a result of redesigning/modeling the city after Northern Wi(Bugwi) dynasty’s Nag’yang Capital. With these changes, apparently the Goguryeo ruling class was hoping to increase the efficiency in their controlling of the population.
Meanwhile, Goguryeo implemented these gridded city plans -symbolizing the bureaucratic nature of the society and ruling structure- in the Guknae-seong capital and Hanseong as well, creating a Three Capitals system, including these two and the aforementioned Pyeong’yang capital. Such effort can be regarded as a testimony to the Goguryeo ruling power’s determination to strongly impose central control on local regions.
Since its transfer of the capital to Pyeong’yang in 427, Goguryeo had been facing certain changes in its political norms, such as the absolute authority of the king intensifying and members of the aristocratic class turning into bureaucrats. The landscape of the capital changed accordingly, which displays two distinctive features especially in the Pyeong’yeang era’s Early half: Newly established Buddhist monasteries (with high-storied pagodas at their centers) that replaced large-scale burial mounds of earlier periods which symbolized the kings’ authority, and gridded city plans (for a bureaucratic society) which replaced past castles on plain grounds that signified the power of the central aristocrats. While high pagodas manifested the transcendental nature of leaders, the gridded streets and roads represented the bureaucratic nature of the leading circle.
Next, the Pyeong’yeang era’s Latter half also featured two distinctive characteristics in the Pyeong’yang capital(the Jang’an-seong capital). The inner space of the Capital(Gyeong, 京) was divided to differentiate officials from civilians, and internal grids were supplemented with tall walls(according to the “Bangjang-je” institution). This was a result of redesigning/modeling the city after Northern Wi(Bugwi) dynasty’s Nag’yang Capital. With these changes, apparently the Goguryeo ruling class was hoping to increase the efficiency in their controlling of the population.
Meanwhile, Goguryeo implemented these gridded city plans -symbolizing the bureaucratic nature of the society and ruling structure- in the Guknae-seong capital and Hanseong as well, creating a Three Capitals system, including these two and the aforementioned Pyeong’yang capital. Such effort can be regarded as a testimony to the Goguryeo ruling power’s determination to strongly impose central control on local regions.
목차
머리말
1. 전기 평양 도성의 경관과 대왕전제체제
2. 후기 평양 도성[장안성]의 경관과 국가적 지향
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (67)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
발해 5경 명칭 출현 시기에 관한 사료적 검토
고구려발해연구
2016 .07
-
낙경(落京)
문학들
2023 .11
-
故 조가경(曺街京) 교수님을 기억하며
철학과 현실
2022 .03
-
조선 · 청 외교문서의 교섭경로와 성경의 역할
역사와현실
2018 .03
-
도성 관련 용어 검토 — ‘都’ㆍ‘郭’ㆍ‘京’을 중심으로 —
사림
2017 .01
-
淸初 三藩의 亂과 盛京 지역 주변정세의 변화
이화사학연구
2020 .01
-
대동법 시행기 進上制의 정비와 영조대 초반 『進上別單謄錄』의 작성
한국사학보
2022 .02
-
조선후기 行商 조직의 座目과 인원 변동 - 禮德沔唐과 京都所 · 京都廳의 사례 -
장서각
2020 .10
-
고려사회의 심연으로 들어가는 창, 개경 : 정은정, 『고려 開京 · 京畿 연구』 (혜안, 2018)
한국민족문화
2019 .02
-
日本 京都 出土 高麗 · 朝鮮陶瓷의 現況과 性格
문화사학
2019 .06
-
『京都雜誌』「風俗」편 번역의 오류 문제
민족문화
2015 .12
-
근대 일본의 화엄사상과 국가
한국불교학
2016 .01
-
출토자료로 본 商 遺民의 해체와 재편 - 서주 핵심지역을 중심으로 -
중국고중세사연구
2020 .02
-
頤齋 黃胤錫의 科場 出入 풍경
역사와경계
2015 .12
-
西行 시절 頤齋 黃胤錫의 交遊 원칙 －京華士族을 중심으로－
대동한문학(大東漢文學)
2021 .09
-
「『高麗圖經』 譯註」(5) : 권3 「城邑」편의 「坊市」 ~ 「郡邑」과 권4 「門闕」편의 분석을 중심으로
한국사학보
2017 .11
-
『西京詩話』의 구성 체제와 문헌적 특성
고전과 해석
2020 .01
-
고려 예종대 西京 龍堰宮 경영과 역사계승의식
사림
2021 .01
-
경고하는 언론 — 러일전쟁과 중국 저널의 보도 —
사림
2024 .01
-
『고려사(高麗史)』「악지(樂志)」속악(俗樂) 편집의 특징과 정치성
국문학연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000839489