메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kwon, Jeong-Kee (Woosuk University)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제63집
발행연도
2020.6
수록면
335 - 356 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Living in a ‘culture of analgesics’ characterised by complete departure from a belief in the value of suffering, we experience loss of the ability to face life. By offering theoretical and ethical responses to ‘meaningless’ affliction, injustice and suffering, a ‘theodicy’ seeks to validate a cultural reality which sustains a way of life. Salvation religions which find most of their adherents amongst the underprivileged strata of society prescribe that the unequal distribution of chances in life are results of the sin of the privileged, which is to provoke God’s vengeance.
This essay attempts to construct a social biography of the Korean discourse of han. First it demonstrates a kind of family resemblance between the discourse and the Nietzschean concept of ‘ressentiment’. In this discursive nexus, a discussion follows on the idiosyncrasies of han and its metamorphosis from victimology to soteriology in distinct but mutually overlapping stages. In a seemingly unescapable circumstances of indefinitely prolonged psychosomatic sufferings, the essay observes, the motif of han discourse moves from resignation via reservation to commitment. The han ethos, initially a state of individual psychology, proves in this way to be plastic enough to find its way towards collective as well as individual affirmation. Then the innately dynamic master narrative of han is wont to be shared and negotiated towards what Nietzsche has called a ‘slave revolt’. The essay concludes that the basic experience of shared han of Koreans is a sense of suffering as a people, and this soteriological appropriation of han theodicy has acted as historical memory and anticipation of suffering and therefore may deserve the term ‘unique’.

목차

I. Introduction
Ⅱ. Social Biography of Ressentiment
Ⅲ. Victimology and Soteriology
Ⅳ. The Politics of Han
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References
Abstract

참고문헌 (128)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0