지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제115호
- 발행연도
- 2020.3
- 수록면
- 201 - 240 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.03.115.201
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After Daehan Empire was established, the Imperial government planned to launch an academic project designed to compile historical and geographical data concerning the Northern territories of the country, as such data could surely be used in resolving border disputes with Qing. Abang Gan g’yeok-go, written by Jeong Yak-yong was primarily consulted as an important source of information, and Jang Ji-yeon, who was at the time serving as Managing Editor of the Hwangseong Shinmun Newspaper, was put in charge of the supplementation process.
In Abang Gan g’yeok-go, particularly through a series of discussions of history and geography, Jeong Yak-yong emphasized that boundaries of the Joseon territory was ‘finalized’ by the establishment of the Four Gun units and Six Jin Garrisons, during the reigns of kings Sejong and Sejo. He also argued that in order to maintain such territory the late Four Commanderies below the Abrok-gang river should be rebuilt, and the Northern regions be properly defended and stabilized. Then 70 years later, in Daehan Gan g’yeok-go, Jang Ji-yeon, instead of just acknowledging Jeong Yak-yong’s position which viewed the Duman-gang and Abrok-gang rivers as natural borderlines, displayed an alternative view of Joseon’s territory in which he suggested the idea of expanding the country’s territory to other regions and re-demarcating the country’s borderlines. In other words, Jang Ji-yeon was essentially offering a critical view of Jeong Yak-yong’s stance, by providing a new take on the origin of the country’s Northern territories, and asking for a new borderline that would recognize ancient territories of the country. In order to do this, while utilizing the contents of Abang Gangyeok-go nonetheless, Jang left out several parts of Jeong’s original writing while supposedly creating a ‘supplemented version,’ and even eliminated certain segments he deemed unnecessary. He also added some new contents regarding the ‘Monument at Mt. Baekdu-san for Demarcation,’ and strongly asked for recovery of ancient territory as well as anew borderline.
Coexisting in Jang’s mind were two types of thinking that came from different eras. He pointed to Gando as the place of origin for the dynasty itself, and then argued that it should be reclaimed and recovered. It was a fairly premodern, and also a conceptual, even abstract attitude to begin with. Then again, he wanted the new borderline, based on the aforementioned ‘Monument at Mt. Baekdu-san for Demarcation,’ to be officially recognized by International law(the ‘Universal law,’ as referred to at the time), and this was admittedly a significantly modern take on seeking acknowledgements on territorial rights. Although Joseon resorted to consulting the study of Jeong Yak-yong, which was a product of a mind from the past (the Shilhak trend of the late Joseon period to be exact), in response to a territorial dispute that occurred in the present(late 19th century), the people of the time including Jang Ji-yeon were also in the process of newly accepting modern geographical concepts (“territorial sovereignty”) and opening up to the idea of entering the Universal law system of the world. As a result, what Jeong Yak-yong considered as ‘complete’ in his Abang Gan g’yeok-go had to be newly defined by Jang Ji-yeon as ‘incomplete (with regions that were yet to be claimed),’ which displays the nature of modern historio-geographical views of the Daehan Empire period.
But Jang’s such view and ideals needed the existence of a modernized, sovereign state to be properly realized. The political condition of the Empire was a variable that could either facilitate or thwart Jang’s intentions. And after the Empire was annexed by Imperial Japan, the concept of establishing imperial borderlines and preserve the legitimacy of the dynasty was effectively nullified, and the range of ‘ancient territories that would have to be reclaimed’ was conceptually expanded (beyond Gando) to the entire Manchu region which was under imperial Japanese rule. And the notion of ‘reclaiming ancient territories’ transformed into another idea of ‘citizens of colonized Joseon pioneering the Manchu region.’
In Abang Gan g’yeok-go, particularly through a series of discussions of history and geography, Jeong Yak-yong emphasized that boundaries of the Joseon territory was ‘finalized’ by the establishment of the Four Gun units and Six Jin Garrisons, during the reigns of kings Sejong and Sejo. He also argued that in order to maintain such territory the late Four Commanderies below the Abrok-gang river should be rebuilt, and the Northern regions be properly defended and stabilized. Then 70 years later, in Daehan Gan g’yeok-go, Jang Ji-yeon, instead of just acknowledging Jeong Yak-yong’s position which viewed the Duman-gang and Abrok-gang rivers as natural borderlines, displayed an alternative view of Joseon’s territory in which he suggested the idea of expanding the country’s territory to other regions and re-demarcating the country’s borderlines. In other words, Jang Ji-yeon was essentially offering a critical view of Jeong Yak-yong’s stance, by providing a new take on the origin of the country’s Northern territories, and asking for a new borderline that would recognize ancient territories of the country. In order to do this, while utilizing the contents of Abang Gangyeok-go nonetheless, Jang left out several parts of Jeong’s original writing while supposedly creating a ‘supplemented version,’ and even eliminated certain segments he deemed unnecessary. He also added some new contents regarding the ‘Monument at Mt. Baekdu-san for Demarcation,’ and strongly asked for recovery of ancient territory as well as anew borderline.
Coexisting in Jang’s mind were two types of thinking that came from different eras. He pointed to Gando as the place of origin for the dynasty itself, and then argued that it should be reclaimed and recovered. It was a fairly premodern, and also a conceptual, even abstract attitude to begin with. Then again, he wanted the new borderline, based on the aforementioned ‘Monument at Mt. Baekdu-san for Demarcation,’ to be officially recognized by International law(the ‘Universal law,’ as referred to at the time), and this was admittedly a significantly modern take on seeking acknowledgements on territorial rights. Although Joseon resorted to consulting the study of Jeong Yak-yong, which was a product of a mind from the past (the Shilhak trend of the late Joseon period to be exact), in response to a territorial dispute that occurred in the present(late 19th century), the people of the time including Jang Ji-yeon were also in the process of newly accepting modern geographical concepts (“territorial sovereignty”) and opening up to the idea of entering the Universal law system of the world. As a result, what Jeong Yak-yong considered as ‘complete’ in his Abang Gan g’yeok-go had to be newly defined by Jang Ji-yeon as ‘incomplete (with regions that were yet to be claimed),’ which displays the nature of modern historio-geographical views of the Daehan Empire period.
But Jang’s such view and ideals needed the existence of a modernized, sovereign state to be properly realized. The political condition of the Empire was a variable that could either facilitate or thwart Jang’s intentions. And after the Empire was annexed by Imperial Japan, the concept of establishing imperial borderlines and preserve the legitimacy of the dynasty was effectively nullified, and the range of ‘ancient territories that would have to be reclaimed’ was conceptually expanded (beyond Gando) to the entire Manchu region which was under imperial Japanese rule. And the notion of ‘reclaiming ancient territories’ transformed into another idea of ‘citizens of colonized Joseon pioneering the Manchu region.’
#『아방강역고』
#『대한강역고』
#정약용
#장지연
#공법
#이역(異域)
#고토 회복
#영토주권
#국경 문제
#간도
#만주
#Abang Gang'yeok-go
#Daehan Gang'yeok-go
#Jeong Yak-yong
#Jang Ji-yeon
#Universal Law(“Gongbeob,” International Law)
#foreign territory(“Iyeok, 異域”)
#reclaiming ancient territory
#territorial sovereignty
#border issues
#the Gando region
#the Manju region
목차
머리말
1. 20세기 초 국경 인식과 조선후기 강역론의 재해석
2. 장지연의 국경 문제 제기와 영토 인식의 변화
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
코퍼스 기반 현대중국어 유의어 ‘剛’, ‘剛剛’, ‘剛才’와 ‘了’의 공기(共現) 연구
중국어문학논집
2021 .08
-
황효공(黃孝恭)의 『역범도(易範圖)』 연구 - 『귀암집』의 내용을 포함하여
한국학논집
2021 .09
-
정약용의 역사의식과 개혁사상
韓國史學史學報
2019 .01
-
영토 · 해양 일지
영토해양연구
2024 .12
-
역학과 명리의 근본 원리 고찰
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
일본 외교사료관 소장 『간도의 판도에 관한 淸韓 양국 紛議 一件』을 통해 보는 북방 영토 연구
한국사학보
2021 .02
-
姜龍夏의 尊華意識과 ｢華山十二曲｣**
南冥學硏究
2018 .01
-
역사교육에서의 영토 교육 현황과 문제점 : 2011 교육과정에 의한 고등학교 한국사 교과서의 영토 관련 서술을 중심으로
역사와실학
2015 .08
-
일본 ‘영토·주권 전시관’의 영토 문제 관련 홍보·전시에 대한 연구 - 독도 관련 코너를 중심으로 -
독도연구
2023 .06
-
영토 · 해양 일지
영토해양연구
2020 .12
-
영토 · 해양 일지
영토해양연구
2016 .06
-
영토·해양 일지
영토해양연구
2023 .06
-
기해사행(己亥使行)의 당상역관(堂上譯官) : 대마도 종가문서(宗家文書)에서 등장양상을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2017 .08
-
삼강(三剛)의 발생과 성립 과정에 대한 연구
철학논총
2022 .01
-
재편된 공간-조선시대 驛분포 양상의 추이와 특징
사학연구
2024 .09
-
16세기 조선의 압록강 하구 도서(島嶼)에 대한 영토인식과 외교전략
역사와현실
2015 .09
-
1950년대 일본 고유영토설의 정치적 분쟁화 모순점에 대한 고찰
영토해양연구
2018 .06
-
≪咸賓錄≫: 明代 지리서에 재현된 異域
중국어문논총
2018 .01
-
이강회와 정약용의 교유에 대한 연구
차문화산업학
2017 .01
-
통감부시기 간도의 경계 분쟁과 統監府臨時間島派出所의 역할
역사와경계
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
신채호의 만주인식과 그 변모
표언복
비교한국학
2011
.01
‘세심한’ 읽기와 ‘대담한’ 해석 : 김명호 『홍대용과 항주의 세 선비』, 돌베개 2020
노경희
창작과비평
2021
.03
대한제국기 관세제도와「울도군 절목」의 세금, 그리고 독도 실효지배
유미림
영토해양연구
2017
.06
1906년 진자이 요시타로(神西由太郞)와 심흥택(沈興澤) 울도군수의 만남
송휘영
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016
.04
네이션 빌딩과 여성영웅의 서사 : 쉴러의 『오를레앙의 처녀』와 장지연의 『애국부인전』
박인원
카프카연구
2014
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000500950