메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이중언어학회 이중언어학 이중언어학 제76호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
137 - 162 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is part of the discussion to set the standard of what well-constructed multiple choice answers should be for main idea questions in reading tests of the Korean Language. In particular, it is to examine how text type as a variable is related to finding the main idea. To do this, we reviewed the results of previous studies that dealt with the correlation between text type and main idea, and presented major research problems based on them. In addition, the major research issues were applied and analyzed for texts and answers of the questions presented in reading section on TOPIK(Test of Proficiency in Korean). As a result of the above research, the following could be suggested primarily. Brinker(1985) divided the main types of informative text into three categories: descriptive, explanatory, and demonstrative text. However, while the rheme of descriptive texts usually expand, the rheme of explanatory or demonstrative texts often converge into a single argument. According to this, it is natural to represent the main idea of a descriptive text in the form of a noun phrase, whereas it is natural to represent the main idea of explanatory or demonstrative text in the form of a sentence. It is suggested that constructing multiple choice answers based on this principle will help to build a valid question.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0