Validity of Self-reported Hypertension and Factors Related to Discordance Between Self-reported and Objectively Measured Hypertension: Evidence From a Cohort Study in Iran

Farid Najafi; Yahya Pasdar; Ebrahim Shakiba; Behrooz Hamzeh; Mitra Darbandi; Mehdi Moradinazar; Jafar Navabi; Bita Anvari; Mohammad Reza Saidi; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Farid Najafi Yahya Pasdar Ebrahim Shakiba Behrooz Hamzeh Mitra Darbandi Mehdi Moradinazar Jafar Navabi Bita Anvari Mohammad Reza Saidi Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi

저널정보: 대한예방의학회 예방의학회지 예방의학회지 제52권 제2호

발행연도: 2019.1

수록면: 131 - 139 (9page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Objectives: Self-reporting can be used to determine the incidence and prevalence of hypertension (HTN). The present study was conducted to determine the validity of self-reported HTN and to identify factors affecting discordance between self-reported and objectively measured HTN in participants in the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) cohort. Methods: The RaNCD cohort included permanent residents of Ravansar, Iran aged 35-65 years. Self-reported data were collected before clinical examinations were conducted by well-trained staff members. The gold standard for HTN was anti-hypertensive medication use and blood pressure measurements. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of self-reporting were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to examine the discordance between self-reported HTN and the gold standard. Results: Of the 10 065 participants in the RaNCD, 4755 (47.4%) were male. The prevalence of HTN was 16.8% based on self-reporting and 15.7% based on medical history and HTN measurements. Of the participants with HTN, 297 (18.8%) had no knowledge of their disease, and 313 (19.9%) had not properly controlled their HTN despite receiving treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa for self-reported HTN were 75.5%, 96.4%, and 73.4%, respectively. False positives became more likely with age, body mass index (BMI), low socioeconomic status, and female sex, whereas false negatives became more likely with age, BMI, high socioeconomic status, smoking, and urban residency. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of self-reported HTN were acceptable, suggesting that this method can be used for public health initiatives in the absence of countrywide HTN control and detection programs.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

NCD Risk Factor Collaboration(NCD-RisC) / 2017 / Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015 : a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants / Lancet 389(10064):37~55

Zhong Y / 2017 / Secular changes in cardiovascular risk factors in Swedish 50-year-old men over a 50-year period : the study of men born in 1913, 1923, 1933, 1943, 1953 and 1963 / Eur J Prev Cardiol 24(6):612~620

Lawes CM / 2006 / Blood pressure and the global burden of disease 2000. Part II: estimates of attributable burden / J Hypertens 24(3):423~430

Chobanian AV / 2003 / The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure : the JNC 7 report / JAMA 289(19):2560~2572

Kearney PM / 2005 / Global burden of hypertension : analysis of worldwide data / Lancet 365(9455):217~223

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!