메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조원희 (한국학중앙연구원)
저널정보
동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第148輯
발행연도
2019.9
수록면
155 - 180 (26page)
DOI
10.17856/jahs.2019.9.148.155

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article examines how the ruling Mongols perceived and understood the different “religions,” focusing on the less familiar, the more minor “religions” during the Mongol rule of China. Specifically, it will focus on the Jews, White Cloud Sect (baiyunzong 白雲宗) and the Confucians. Although most modern scholars would generally agree that these three religions would all fit into what we would call “religions,” the analysis in this research demonstrates that the status of each of the three different religions differed significantly. Unlike the Buddhists, Daoists, Christians, and Muslims, the Jews were often treated as a subgroup of the generic “westerners (huihui 回回)” and did not receive the tax exemption privileges. The White Cloud Sect once established themselves as a separate sect from the larger Han Chinese Buddhists, but due to their reliance of influential individuals such as the Yanglianzhenjia and Danba, their influence in the central court quickly diminished after the death of these two figures. In the early days of the Mongol empire, Confucians were often grouped with other religions, but later the Mongol treated them as a group of individuals who could contribute to the Mongol empire through their knowledge and education. In other words, in the eyes of the Mongols, the three different “religions” were not merely the same, and the relationship between each religion and the Mongol state determined each religions fact. And in that sense, I argue that emphasis on the rulers, and focus on the relation between the empire and subjects can be another useful way to approach and analyze “religions” in history.

목차

서론
1. 유대인: ‘종교’ 혹은 ‘종족?’
2. 白雲宗: ‘이단’ 극복과 한계
3. 儒人: ‘종교’와 ‘전문가’의 사이
결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-910-001240660