메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제한국어교육학회 한국어 교육 한국어 교육 제26권
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
163 - 187 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze the advanced Korean Language curricula at major language institutions in Korea and further compare the mastery level of the advanced curriculum with the rating system of the International Standard Curriculum of Korean Language. In order to do this, the general objectives and items of topics and functions within Levels 5 to 7 in the International Standard Curriculum, along with the objectives, topics and functions in advanced curricula in major Korean language institutes were analyzed. Followed by a comparative analysis of the objectives and educational contents in the advanced level curriculum of Korean language institutes with the International standard Curriculum of Korean Language, the level of mastery between objectives and educational contents were compared and analyzed. The objectives in Levels 5 to 6 in the International Standard Curriculum were expressing opinions regarding social and abstract topics, and understanding topics from professional fields unfamiliar to the learner in presentations, discussions and debate. The items of topics and functions were also provided accordingly. The objectives that were analyzed from the advanced level curriculum in Korean language institutes were set from Level 5 and 6 to Level 7 in the Standard Curriculum. Among the Level 6 objectives, ‘professional fields, academic topics, professional materials, university level tasks, and complex and professional tasks’ were included as significant portion and this is equivalent to Level 7 in the standard curriculum. The topics from the advanced level curriculum in Korean language institutes mainly included the topic items within the Standard Curriculum and were equivalent to its advanced level. However, there was an imbalance of topics in certain fields and the topics were not covered in depth; moreover, the differences between levels amongst topics in the advanced curriculum of each institute were evident. Regarding function, there was also an imbalance in items in the advanced level curriculum and a high frequency of functions from the basic or intermediate level; therefore, the functions in the advanced curriculum were lower than the suggested level in the International Standard Curriculum. The differences between the functional items compared with the educational objectives in each institute were also significant.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0