메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국환경법학회 환경법연구 환경법연구 제40권 제3호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
377 - 410 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper reviews and compares the legal and institutional structures of EU and Korea regarding the control of F-gas. Various directives and regulations, programs and initiatives to reduce F-gas emissions in EU are scrutinized. Korea’s related laws and government initiatives are examined and compared with EU’s directives and programs. The authors attempt to characterize both countries’ laws and institutions from the viewpoints of integration, enforcement, and incentives. It is observed that Korea’s micro-level policy tools have followed EU with a time lag. However, despite the recent amendment of CACA, ARCEEV and other related laws and regulations, F-gas control laws and system in Korea still lack integration. The recent amendment of CACA extended the coverage of those who are subject to the refrigerants management standard .and introduced the specialized refrigerants recovery agent system. Despite this amendment, there are still some F-gases, equipments and sectors that are not effectively controlled by the Korean legal system. It is questionable whether there is any meaningful economic incentive to diligent recovery activity of the business owners or the recovery agents. Korea’s enforcement mechanism is not yet seriously examined, and the effectiveness is questioned. A comprehensive F-gas control measure, including a new legislation with separate reduction target and strategies, deserves a serious consideration.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0