메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국법정책학회 법과 정책연구 법과 정책연구 제9권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
723 - 747 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Real-name financial transaction system that has been in force since 1993 has rectified the practice of opening deposit account in the name of a person who is not contributor or unreal person. However, still many deposits contracts are formulated in other's name for various reasons such as the application of Act of Depositor Protection, concealment of slush fund, though real-name financial transaction system has taken root. Such problems arose from the recognition of the contributor as deposit account holder through the Supreme Court's broad application of implicit agreement that the contributor shall be the deposit account holder in the relationship between the contributor and financial organization for the deposit bank account even after the enforcement of real-name financial transaction system On March 19, 2009, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the deposit account holder shall be considered the depositor if the deposit agreement is executed through the verification of real name according to the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and the fact pertaining to the verification of the real name is reflected accurately in the deposit account. The Supreme Court made it clear that the existence of explicit and/or implicit agreement which recognizes the deposit account in non-real name in violation of Enforcement Decree of the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions is limited to extremely rare cases by saying “if the contributor, not the deposit account holder, is to be considered the depositor, it should be limited to the extremely exceptional case in which there is a concurrence of clear intention that the right of the deposit account holder shall be excluded by denying the written deposit contract executed with the deposit account holder through the verification of real name between the financial organization and contributor and executing deposit contract with the contributor, etc, in order to revert to the contributor the right to claim the return of deposit.” This unanimous ruling is consistent with the theory pertaining to the general principle of legal behavior and the evidential power of disposal document with respect to the decision of the party to the contract. In addition, this ruling paved the way for solidifying the real-name financial transaction system which has been in force for 16 years.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0