메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대구사학회 대구사학 대구사학 제99권
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
111 - 137 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Scholars claimed that from the middle of the nineteenth century the tradition of Grand tour gave its way to the emergence of mass tourism. This article criticizes the pervasive scholarly judgement that emphasizes the shift from travel to tourism, and the difference and the rapture between them. Mass tourism remains as a controversial terminology and historians and sociologists randomly apply it with their own perspectives. While many sociologist who specialized modern tourism interpret the mass tourism as a product of mass consumerism after the World War Ⅱ, a group of historians trace its origin back to 1815, the year of following the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars. The mass tourism, however, could only have developed with the improvements in technology, allowing the transport of large numbers of people in a short space of time. With these infrastructure, Thomas Cook who was able to launch the first group package tour with chartered train for working class. Behind the Cook’s effort to defend for his working class clients, existed the strong snobbism of Victorian elites. More seriously, today’s scholars inheriting the sentiment build a stubborn dichotomy between the Grand Tour and the mass tourism. This article demonstrates that the making of a sharp distinction between these two types of travel is arbitrary. Mass tourism comprises a very diverse set of activities. The history of travel, therefore, is best seen as a history of coexisting and styles whose temporal boundaries blur.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (43)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0