메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
어문연구학회 어문연구 어문연구 제63권
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
5 - 31 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
‘-eo-issta', representing the function of resultative aspect, has constraints on the verbs which occur before it. It has been widely accepted that only the intransitive verbs which has telicity as their aspectual character, can occur as V1 in V1-eo-issta' constructions. We can call the verb constraint semantic, and the transitive verb constraint syntactic. But semantic constraint cannot be explained fully by telicity condition which demand V1 to be telic verb. Because there are many examples which telicity condition cannot explain. So some other argument were offered to elucidate the semantic constraints: existence condition, resultative condition, etc. But these arguments have defects, too. So I offered cognitive condition to explain the semantic constraints. For the explanation of syntactic constraints there have been several suggestions: existence condition, ‘-eo iss-' syntagmatic constraint, and dynamic condition. But they could not solve the problem of the syntactic constraints completely. So, in this paper I argued that thematic role can solve the problem. ‘V1-eo-issta' compositionally assigns ‘theme' role to subject. Therefore in the transitive verb sentences object cannot be assigned thematic role, ‘theme', because this thematic role is assigned to subject by ‘V1-eo issta'. Assigning theme to object violates the thematic criterion. Therefore the ungrammaticality of transitive verb sentences is explained by thematic criterion.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0