메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제25권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
81 - 108 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Civil Law partial Amendment in 2005, of which the main goal is to improve children's welfare and to settle down the bi-sexual equality family system, introduced an accomplishment of bi-sexual equality in family, a reasonable reduction of prohibition range of marriage, a possibility of changing the family name for children's welfare, a national function reinforcement on the matter of bringing-up the children and custody after a divorce, an recognition of custody denial right on the Mother, and a full-adoption system. Those are on the base of world-widely common and general human-right mind and a general value which is granted in human society, unexceptionally carried out as a common tendency among many countries in the world. Especially the Civil Law Amendment in 2005, repealed `the Head of Family System' from Jan. 1. 2008, and established a new family concept and range, and also ordered a birth of new official identification records which enable to prove and announce publicly the identification relation reasonably without an assumption of `the Head of Family and Family'. Therefore, the government proclaimed `the Family Relation Registration Act' as a substitutional law of `the Family Register Act', in May 2007 to intercept an important blank of official records which prove and announce publicly the identification relation previously and to prevent the confusion caused, and has carried it out since Jan. 1. 2008. In the mean time, `the Family Relation Registration Act' which is not on the assumption of `the Head of Family and Family', the purpose of which is a management of registration and attestation of family relation occurrence and change such as a birth, a marriage, and a death of people, would be expected to bring a both-material and immaterial- social value like a constitutional idea accomplishment of a personal dignity and bi-sexual equality, an apparent protection and enforcement of personal identification information, a soundness of local finance, an efficiency of registration affair, a legal security, a convenience promotion of people. They are all possible through the national business of family relation registration affair, a formation of individual family relation registration records and a management by an organization of computerized information management, an issuing various kinds of certificates according to the use and clearness of issuing application standard, a preparation of concrete procedure after `the Civil Law Amendment', an improvement of some imperfections in current `the Family Register Act', a notification of nationality change, and an enforcement of penalty on the person who abuses family relation information . However, the problems which could be anticipated while `the Family Relation Registration Act' is carried out, which are like a discreet management of delicate personal information such as trans-gender, an usage, application, and watching of registration computerized information materials for a personal life protection, a minimizing social expense caused when issuing various kinds of certificates according to the use, a confusion of succession and change of liability caused when the sexuality can be changed relatively easily, an interception of paternal blood and indiscreet recognition of both parental blood, and a prior interception of 'the marriage an immediate relative' which could be happened during registering a full-adoption, should be discussed more closely and deeply. After all, `the Family Relation Registration Act' and the problems caused while carrying it out, should be understood in view of a spread of world-widely common and general human right mind and an existence of human right concept, and should be discussed on the premise that we should accept and reflect the value which is generally aimed and recognized in human society to a certain standard.
#가족관계등록법 #호적법 #가족관계등록부 #호주제폐지 #신분공시 #개인별등록. #Family Relation Registration Act #Family Register Act #Hojuk-Bub) #Head of Family #Abolishment of the Head of Family System #Publicity of Status Registration.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청
/ / 법률신문, 2007년 6월 4일, 제3559호 google schola / / 조선일보, 2009년 7월 20일, 제27546호 google schola / 2008 / 대한변협신문, 2008. 3. 24, 제213호 google schola Gillian Douglas / 2004 / An Introduction to Family Law(Clarendon Law Series) / Oxford University Press google schola Harry D. Krause / 2003 / Family Law(West Nutshell Series) / Thomson West google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0