메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
경성대학교 산업개발연구소 산업혁신연구 산업혁신연구 제25권 제3호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
137 - 154 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
From the panel regression analysis, we compared the relationships among bank asset size, risk-taking and performance for the two different regulatory regimes in Korean banking industry; 1994∼1997, the period of deregulation, vs 2000∼2005, the period of tightened regulation. We found that larger banks took riskier strategies than smaller banks for the pre∼1997 period of very loose regulation. But their strategies were significantly more profitable than smaller banks. Thus, we conclude that severe moral hazard problem associated with firm size did not exist in Korean banking industry, and therefore, this may not have been one of the main reasons for the financial crisis during the period of at least 1994∼1997. After the regulation got tightened since 1998, we found that the tendency of the larger banks to take profitable risk-taking strategies became weaker. That is, the risk-taking incentives of larger banks became weaker, and moreover, the positive association between risk-taking and profitability became weaker after regulatory reforms. These results may be attributed to the fact that the acquisition of unhealthy, riskier and smaller banks by larger banks was the main method of reorganizing and resolving the financial crisis for the period of post∼1998 in Korean banking industry, and this may have aggravated the profitability of the larger banks.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0