메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제14권 제5호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
457 - 474 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study investigates a recognition difference of priority order in Financial Ratio by each stakeholder (CEO, stockholders, creditors. The questionnaire was conducted mainly in Seoul and Daegu area. The number of respondents is 73, 25 of which are CEOs (34.2%); 23 stockholders (31.5%); and 25 creditors (34.2%). In evaluating the value of a firm, Profit Index is the primary criteria for all stakeholders, followed by Stability Index and Activity and Growth Index. For secondary criteria, return on asset was ranked as most crucial in Profit Index; current ratio in Stability Index and inventory turnover ratio in Activity and Growth Index. For all stakeholders (CEO, stockholders, creditors) Profitability Index is of the highest importance, different from conventional beliefs that Stability Index would be the overarching criterion for creditors, which suggests no index can better promote a firm’s image than profitability. Lastly, looking at the distinction according to the type of stakeholders in combined standards that puts both primary and secondary criteria into consideration simultaneously, executives and creditors prioritized Return on Assets among 12 items in Financial Index while stockholders pointed to EPS as the most significant factor. This indicates how much net profit investment generates is the top concern of the stockholders. This study has great implications in that it is the first comparative analysis of which Financial Ratio is considered the most value-related by each of the stakeholders.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0