메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제12권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
183 - 200 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Many countries try to secure agricultural sector for its multifunctional advantage. My objective is to find whether agricultural subsidy is unnecessary as some insist. To do so, I first discuss legal definition of subsidies and the main differences between Agriculture Agreement and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM). Korean agricultural subsidy policy was studied where substantial amount of money were invested. Some countries like the US and EU also in the process of increasing agricultural subsidies in various ways. The case studies show how the US and Korea deal their disputes on agricultural subsidy. Recent development on agricultural subsidy issue were reviewed and it was found that agricultural subsidy for Korea should not be reduced nor neglected since every nations try to increase their agricultural subsidies despite WTO agreement has set limits. DDA (Doha Development Agenda) Negotiation was not concluded last year though it was studied for 15 years. Most recent DDA forum discussed wider reform in agricultural subsidy area, which means Korea has to prepare New Negotiation where Korea may be treated as a developed nation and be ready to make new agricultural policy. Otherwise, Korea may retard agricultural development while others promote.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0