메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Rapid detection of pathogens in blood is important in patient management, because the mortality rate associated with bloodstream infections is very high. We evaluated the efficiency of a 16S rDNA PCR assay for the detection of various pathogens in blood culture broth in a clinical laboratory. Methods: 16S rDNA PCR was performed on 221 blood culture bottles consisting of 99 culturepositive and 122 culture-negative samples. The results were compared with conventional culture methods. We also compared the efficiency of three DNA extraction and purification methods using proteinase K, triton X-100, and benzyl alcohol-guanidine DNA extraction of blood culture broths. Results: The 16S rDNA PCR method detected 95 (12 Staphylococcus aureus, 27 coagulase negative staphylococci, 10 enterococci, 5 streptococci, 37 gram negative bacilli, 4 corynebacteria) of 99 positive culture bottles. Four false-negative results were obtained for bottles containing 2 Corynebacterium, 1 Escherichia coli, and 1 S. aureus species. All 122 bottles that showed no blood culture growth were negative by 16S rDNA PCR. Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of 16S rDNA PCR relative to the culture results were 96.0%, 100%, 100%, and 96.8%, respectively. Among the three DNA extraction methods, the benzyl alcohol-guanidine method was most effective. Conclusion: The 16S rDNA PCR assay is a rapid and efficient means of detecting various pathogens in the blood and has great potential for use in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0