메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: To compare the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of mean apparentdiffusion coefficient (ADC) values using contrast-enhanced (CE) T1 weightedimage (WI) and T2WI as structural images between manual and semiautomaticsegmentation methods. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and May 2013, 28 patients whounderwent brain MR with diffusion weighted image (DWI) and were pathologicallyconfirmed as having glioblastoma participated in our study. The ADC values weremeasured twice in manual and semiautomatic segmentation methods using CE-T1WIand T2WI as structural images to obtain interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Moreover, intraobserver reliabilities of the different segmentation methods wereassessed after subgrouping of the patients based on the MR findings. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were high in both manualand semiautomatic segmentation methods on CE-T1WI-based evaluation, whileinterobserver reliability on T2WI-based evaluation was not high enough to be used ina clinical context. The intraobserver reliability was particularly lower with the T2WIbasedsemiautomatic segmentation method in the subgroups with involved lobes ≤2, with partially demarcated tumor borders, poorly demarcated inner margins of thenecrotic portion, and with perilesional edema. Conclusion: Both the manual and semiautomatic segmentation methods on CET1WI-based evaluation were clinically acceptable in the measurement of mean ADCvalues with high interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0