메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국고전르네상스영문학회 고전 르네상스 영문학 고전 르네상스 영문학 제16권 제1호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
43 - 60 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Yuna KangThe Parson's Tale has been considered one of the most controversial parts in The Canterbury Tales. Closing The Canterbury Tales, the seemingly conservative Parson cools down the storytelling game and tells the most boring tale to "knytte up al this feeste and make an ende" in a "myrie" tale. To make matters more disappointing for the modern readers, his tale leaves the previous game astray forever; moreover, Chaucer the writer of The Canterbury Tales retracts his lifetime career as a secular writer. Critics on each camp (religious and secular) try to criticize or vindicate this awkward ending in the aspect of the structure or the context. In this paper, the Parson is the archetypal clergyman in the Bible even though he reflects some of the Lollards' revolutionary manifesto. First and foremost he is the shepherd taking care of his sheep, and he tries to present the straightfoward 'sentence' to his people. He is repeatedly speaking of penitence as the only way to reach the truthful life. He commands everyone to repent, even though his confidence is subverted in undercurrents, just like the Prophet Jeremiah in the Bible. Unlike him, however, the Parson's treatise on the penitence is realized by Chaucer the writer's Retraction, which practices faithfully the lesson. Thus Chaucer the secular author surrenders all his authority to the biblical Authority, and allows his work as an examplar of the Transubstantiation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0