메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 외국학종합연구센터 중동연구소 중동연구 중동연구 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
109 - 130 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
President Nasser held power for 18 years, since the 1952 takeover of power until his death in 1970. However, this study limits the period of his effective rule from 1952 to 1967. The reason behind the restriction is due to the Third Arab-Israeli war in 1967 and Egypt's loss, which is significantly weakened the foundation of military rule, and afterward the leadership of Nasser suffered a tremendous breakdown. In this light, Nasser's regime lasted, for all practical purposes, from the revolution of 1952 until the end of the war in 1967, and during this time the central doctrine of Nasserism, his charismatic leadership, and the basics of his political policies were in effect. Therefore, the study analyzes the character of Nasser's government from 1952 to 1967. These programs frequently veered from the original goals and ure and axioms of Nasser, dissecting the ways in which the military elite and the professional bureaucrats maintained the authoritarian system. Attempt is made to explain merely became an extentiont the principles of Nasser's rule using the corporative administration idea from of the government's execution system for it's policies. This phenomenon is a result of the absolute leadership of Nasser within the government and it gave rise to the failure of popular government. The method of authoritarian government based on individual leadership thus prohibited the growth of Egyptian government toward democracy. However, the third Arabian war and Egypt's defeat brought the opposite. Nasser's charismatic leadership was lost, and his power was significantly reduced. In conclusion president Nasser made an attempt to rely solely on military support and his own charismatic leadership rather than a more liberal approach involving popular participation in the government and individual incentives for progress. With the fact that most of the major internal position were occupied by military and technical personnel, and the fact that only restrictive government was possible through bureaucratizing and thus resulting in the exclusion of the popular.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0