메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제33권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
267 - 298 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Japan has contended persistently that Dokdo Island has been the territory of Japan after incorporating it with the territory of Japan in the course of colonization in 1905. On the contrary above the Japan's contention, it is needless to say that Dokdo Island which a specific place in Ulleung Island can see it with the naked eyes during the bright day belongs to Korea just as recognized by the various old documents. From the point of historical view, Japan had incorporated Dokdo Island with the purpose of military usage and security of fishery right. So, Japan has contended that Dokdo Island is an inherent Japan's territory or Japan's territory with the point of international law since Declaration peace line by Korea declared in 1952. Japan has also contended persistently that the best way to solve the issue of Dokdo Island dominion brings a lawsuit through the ICJ(International Court of Justice). Main purpose of this article has analyzed four suggestions(Bringing a lawsuit to ICJ, Joint administration or usage, mediation(or conciliation) by the third country, and blasting the Dokdo Island with the blasting powder or dynamite) to solve the Dokdo issue, and then suggests ideas for controlling Japan's desire to Dokdo Island Most of third people who do not belong to Korea and Japan can think that bringing a lawsuit to ICJ suggested by Japan is the best way to solve the Dokdo issue in case of not knowing the historical relations between Korea and Japan. However, to solve the Dokdo issue through ICJ which has jurisdiction on the basis of the consent of the parties is not really fair to Korea. A main reason is that there are not any reasons to be recognized by the ICJ because Dokdo Island belongs to the Korea's inherent territory without any doubts from the historical and international law point of view. Moreover, it is not fair that Korea will be unilaterally burdened an unimaginable shock such as explosion of an atomic bomb if Korea loses a lawsuit due to unskilled litigation capacity or any other reasons. Joint administration or usage is not a good idea for Korea because Dokdo Island is a inherent island of Korea which can see it with naked eyes in a specific place in Ulleung Island during a bright day. It is impossible to solve the Dokdo issue through mediation(or conciliation) by the third country due to extreme situation confronted between Korea and Japan with the sense of hostility as well. It is understood that the Idea about blasting the Dokdo Island with the blasting powder or dynamite is not reasonable but emotional speaking occurred in extreme situation confronted during the Korea-Japan talks. However, it is evaluated that an idea about bringing a lawsuit to ICJ is comparative advantage in any other solutions of Dokdo issue from the point of the third parties. If so, does Korea have to accept Japan's suggestion? Unfortunately, Japan can think that Japan is none the worse for the loss if Japan loses a lawsuit against Korea. Japan can also think that it is OK or does not mind if Japan loses a lawsuit against Korea even though Japan will be hurt her pride. Therefore, there are something to suggest in this article. Firstly, Korea has to control Japan's strategy which wants to guide worst dispute. Secondly, Korea has to prepare the situation that Security Council of UN makes a recommendation or decides a resolution with a means of settling the Dokdo issue under chapter 7 of UN Charter even though it is not much possibility to happen the situation in reality. Thirdly, in preparing the situation caused the pressure of international community such as resolutions or recommendations under the Security Council of UN, it is requested to research the study on the conditional lawsuit under the jurisdiction framework of the ICJ.
#독도 #분쟁 #영토분쟁 #국제분쟁 #영유권 #중재 #조정 #독도폭파 #분쟁해결 #유엔 #국제사법법원 #선택적 관할권 #조건부 소송 #UN #ICJ #Dokdo #Dokdo Island #Security Council of UN #UN #International Court of Justice #ICJ #International dispute

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (41)

참고문헌 신청
/ / 08. November, 2007 - Motion by Van Baalen and co on the subject of the comfort woman; Motion 291 passed in Canada on 28 November 2007 google schola / / UN해양법협약 제121조 참조 google schola / / http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3 / / 極秘明治三十七八年海戰史, 제4부 제4권 : 20 ~ 21 google schola / / 국무원 고시 제14호 참조 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0