메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제31호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
175 - 211 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Even though the administrative reparation is a part of the administrative remedy system founded upon the ‘rule of law’, the administrative reparation system of China is similar to that of the Republic of Korea, but it also has distinctive Socialist features. Firstly, the Chinese administrative reparation system holds that the government is responsible for its acts only when it is unlawful (referred to as ‘responsibility of unlawfulness principle’). However, it has some exceptions, such as when government acts are based on the rule of law but is unjustified. These exceptions reflect the socialist legal system that regards the speedy resolution of the victim’s complaints to government acts and the minimization of social contradiction as the preservation of public order. Secondly, the Chinese State Tort Liability Act prescribes the detailed categories of unlawful acts of citizens, corporations and other organizations that infringe upon personal liberty and property rights, whereas the Korean administrative reparation law has brief regulations of unlawful acts. Yet, the Chinese State Tort Liability Act has an article defining unlawful government acts as ‘other acts’. Thus, the articles describing the unlawful acts are considered an instance clause. Hence, the clauses guiding the unlawful acts of both countries are similar. Thirdly, the Chinese State Tort Liability Act recommends that the administrative machinery or its agent shall be responsible for providing remedies and the administrative machinery and/or the defendant of the state tort liability action be liable for damages. By contrast, the Korean State Tort Liability Act, distinguishing administrative authorities from administrative machinery, rules that the state or the local autonomous entity, that is, the administrative authority, shall be the defendant of the state tort liability suit. Lastly, the most striking features of the Chinese administrative reparation system is when filing a lawsuit under the State Tort Liability Act, where the victim goes though the preliminary process held by the responsible administrative machinery and then claim damages after the confirmation of unlawful administrative acts. Under the Korean administrative reparation system, anyone who claims damages can file a suit without going through this preliminary process because the court will decide on the unlawful acts and order reparations. These two features stand in sharp contrast between the two countries. Article I, section 96 of the Korean State Tort Liability Act establishes that the extinctive prescription period for state liability claim is three years from when a claimant is aware of damage and a wrongdoer, or otherwise five years according to the article 1, section 96 of State Financial Act. In contrast, the Chinese State Tort Liability Act dictates that a plaintiff can claim damages within two years of when he is aware of unlawful government acts. This short extinctive prescription period can be construed as a reflection of the Socialist legal system. In addition, the Chinese State Tort Liability Act directs that the mediation process (Tiáo Jiě) can be used as a means to end the state liability litigation.
#국가배상 #행정배상) #행정배상절차 #행정배상의무기관 #행정배상의무기관의 선행처리 #행정구류 #제소기한 #조해 #State Tort Liability #Administrative Reparation) #Administrative Reparation Process #Administrative Machinery Liable for Administrative Reparation #Preliminary Process for Administrative Reparation #Administrative Detain #Extinctive Prescription #Mediation #Tiao Ji?)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청
/ / 《세수징수관리법》제26조 제3항 google schola / / 《해관법》제61조 제3항 google schola / / 국가배상법(제3조 및 제3조의 2) google schola / / 국가재정법 제96조 제1항 google schola / / 민법 제776조 제1항 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0