메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제31호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
669 - 713 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the history of modern legal thought, Hans Kelsen has aroused more response than any other jurist. His prolific writings have been published in 24 languages. Kelsen’s earlier work was devoted mainly to basic problems of law and the state; it is in this area that his theories have aroused passionate controversy. Among the early intellectual influences on Kelsen’s legal thought, Kant must be given first place, although it was Kantianism as renewed by Neo-Kantians like Hermann Cohen and Ernst Cassirer. From Kant Kelsen acquired a deeply felt sense of the importance of methodological purity: according to his view, the method of cognition determines the objection of cognition. In the defining the meaning of law, Kelsen attempted to determine whether there is any one element common to all legal systems at all times and places and every level of cultural development. In his search for a conception of law that is based on scientific univerality rather than on political particularism. The constitutive element of law as a coercive social order is the norm or the rule that somebody ought to act in a prescribed way. The structure of the legal norm clearly shows its difference from the moral norm. The basic norm(Grundnorm) supplies the legal order with a principle of unity. The concept of basic norm led Kelsen to the dynamic view of the law as hierachically held together. Rudolf Smend developed his integration theories of constitutional law and the state in the light of sociological and mental scierntific method. Smend made struggle against the traditional theory of legal positivism. He rejected clearly Kelsen’s normativism. The state is seen by Smend a living sprirtual and political life reality, Smend asserted that the state is the process of social integration, the state develops through the dynamic relation of each individual citizen’s will with that of communty at large. The constitution is a legal order of the political life reality of the state. Kelsen is a critic of Smend. Kelsen’s work 'The State as Integration - a principle confrontation -'(Der Staat als Integration - eine prinzipielle Auseinandusetzung -) is a confrontation between his pure theory of law and Smend’s integration theory. In the light of his pure theory of law Kelsen rejected Smend’s legal theory. Kelsen’s critique of Smend’s theory is the main contents in this article. Smend’s ideas had a profound influence on jurists of constitutional law, notably Konrad Hesse.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0