메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 법학연구소 법학논집 법학논집 제8권 제2호
발행연도
2004.1
수록면
73 - 100 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is usual that insurance consumers make contracts with in insurers through intermediaries such as insurance agents insurance brokers Such intermediaries sometimes commit unlawful acts in selling insurance which might cause signbificant losses to insurance consumers. Therefore a relevant regulatory regime about insurers intermediaries is necessary. However there are some differences surrounding the regime among countries such as the U.K, the U.S., Japan , German and Korea. First the U.K, U.S., Japan and Korea take a system regulating strongly insurance intermediaries while German does not However this difference will disappear soon as German is due to introduce a strong regulatory system in 2005. Second the U.K. integrated all kinds of intermediaries including insurance intermediary under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 while the U.S. Japan German and Korea still maintain separate regulatory system The position of the U.K. seems relevant and efficient in that the boundaries among financial products become blurred packaged financial products become common the same function performed by intermediaries must receive the same regulation Third the U.K the U.S., Japan regulate all kinds of insurance intermediaries while Korea does not regulate the employees of the insurer. It is suggested that kora follow the former countries.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0