메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 법학연구소 법학논집 법학논집 제11권 제2호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
35 - 48 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The legal theory of H. L. A. Hart has been appreciated as a successful one that introduces contemporary linguistic philosophy into jurisprudence. The author points out its main features as follows: firstly Hart’s theory deploys as its methodological tool contemporary analytical philosophy, especially that of later Wittgenstein and Oxford ordinary language philosophy and Peter Winch’s descriptive hermeneutical sociology. Secondly it sheds light on unsatisfactory implication of traditional ways of defining legal terms and concepts, and highlights significance of understanding or elucidation of the terms used in jurisprudence. And thirdly it elucidates the central meaning of rules for understanding law, and recognizes the open texture of language. There have been many criticisms on each of these aspects of Hart’s theory. The author scrutinizes those criticisms, and finds that the criticisms have their own right, but that they have little implication on the validity of Hart’s theory. The author asserts that Hart’s theory should be understood as a product of a descriptive sociological enterprise rather than that of ordinary language approach. And if we are ready to understand his theory by way of principle of charity in Davidson’s and Quine’s sense, asserts the author, we can find the meaning of his theory in that way.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0