메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 법학연구원 고려법학 고려법학 제57호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
127 - 168 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korea has adopted a law school system modeled on the American one and 25 universities simultaneously established law schools, phasing out undergraduate law courses, across the nation in 2009 for the first time in its history. Until now, the legal academia took on the cognitive components of legal education, such as legal information, legal analysis, legal doctrines,etc, primarily through lectures while the Judicial Research and Training Institute has provided practice-oriented training in lawyering skills and professional responsibilities. From now on, law schools should educate students in both legal theories and practice skills, assuming the role of the colleges and the Institute at the same time. This essay is aiming at introducing clinical legal education in order to promote Korea's legal education system, because clinical methodology in law teaching is not so familiar in the legal academia and profession, and legal clinics are on a fledgling stage, and different people have different definitions of it across the country. This essay starts with the birth of the modern law school, Dean Langdell's case-Socratic teaching method, dissatisfactions with the method,the beginning of clinical legal education movement, controversies over skills training in law schools and their reluctance to operate legal clinics in the first half of the 20th century. It goes on to describe the drastic expansion of clinical legal education, financial contributions of the Ford Foundation and the U.S. government, academic accomplishments of clinicians and its present situation in America and East Asian Countries, China and Japan. This essay elaborates on the goals of clinical legal education and how to implement clinical methodology, including selection of clinical programs,preparing students for fieldwork, supervision of students, supplementations of fieldwork, and ways to deal with academic interruptions. It concludes that clinical legal education is an unavoidable choice for Korea's law schools,the Attorney-at-Law Act should be revised so that clinical professors and law school students can practice law only for educational purposes, and that government financial support is urgently needed to develop clinical programs.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0