메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교정부학회 한국비교정부학보 한국비교정부학보 제20권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
75 - 100 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is to make a classification of the types of local referendum based on prior research and law, and to analyze the effectiveness of nuclear policy conflict management accordance with the deliberative participation level of local referendum. Local referendum can be categorized by four types into legal force and prime mover. The case analysis objects are Buan, Gyeongju, Samcheok, and Yeongduk where hold three types of local referendum. The standards of analysis on the deliberative participation level are representativeness, clarity, fairness, equity, and reflexivity. The effectiveness of nuclear policy conflict management measures with whether or not reflect results of local referendum and dissolution of conflict. The results are followings. First, in the case of local referendum with legal force, an increase in the deliberative participation level of local referendum leads to an increase in the effectiveness of nuclear policy conflict management. Second, in the case of local referendum without legal force, institutional framework for ensuring the deliberative participation are in poor condition and conflicts do not dissolve due to dispute with respect to fairness. Third, in the case of with and without legal force, it is needed the improvement of institution for the deliberative participation and the enhancement of reflexivity and fairness. Building on the above results, this study suggests that local referendum on nuclear power plant location should be reformed in order to improve the effectiveness of nuclear policy conflict management.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0