메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교형사법학회 비교형사법연구 비교형사법연구 제11권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
409 - 460 (52page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
On May 21st, 2009, theKorea’s Supreme Court upheld a landmark ruling: allowing a family to remove life-sustaining equipment from a comatose patient that had no chance of recovery. Chief Justice Lee Yong-hoon said during the ruling, “Whether or not to stop life-sustaining treatment should be carefully decided upon. Given the overall evidence and condition of health, the patient would die following the removal of life support, which means she is in all intents and purposes already dead. Before falling into her coma, she said that she did not want to be kept alive with machines if there was no chance of recovery. Given this, we believe that she would also want the treatment to be stopped. In this condition, extending her life is meaningless and against her will of dying with dignity.” Following the ruling, the involved hospital discussed the issue with her family, doctors and other experts to determine how to proceed. A few days later the families of two other comatose patients brought suit against other hospitals for the right to remove the patients from life-sustaining equipment. The Supreme Court’s ruling is expected to provide a fresh momentum for the move to make legislation to revise the Medical Law. A majority of the public supports death with dignity, that is, their right to decide whether or not the withdrawal and withholding of life-sustaining treatment, upon a terminally ill patient's request, should be respected. Most Koreans are increasingly thinking about and planning for their own medical treatment in the event of an incurable or irreversible medical condition. Also, the public is willing to allow end-of-life decisions, regarding life- sustaining treatment, by family members. In Korean hospitals, whenever there was a terminal condition, the family needs to be entitled to be informed about the course of treatment and treatment options, which should include life-sustaining devices. Against this backdrop, it is wise to move toward respecting patients' personal choice and to take policy measures as soon as possible. I think that the present might be the right moment to make legislation about euthanasia for the sake of human dignity. This controversy has been taboo for too long. Legislation should be worked out through a broad collection of public opinion and references to successful foreign regulations and practices.
#존엄사 #소극적 안락사 #자연사 #연명치료중단 #생전유언 #의료지시서 #passive euthanasia #death with dignity #terminal illness #life-sustaining treatment #right to die

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (50)

참고문헌 신청
/ / North Carolina General Statues Chapter 90. Medicine and Allied Occupations Article 23. Right to Natural Death § 90-321 google schola / / West Revised Code of Washington Annotated Currentness, Title 7. Public Health and Safety, Chapter 70.122. Natural Death Act, Legislative findings google schola / / http://www.ethikrat.org/stellungnahmen/stellungnahmen.html Aaron Ridley / / Beginning Bioethics / Bedford/St.. Martin's : 164 ~ google schola Albert R. Johnsen / 1998 / The Birth of Bioethics / Oxford University Press : 259 ~ 261 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0