메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The unconscious and the figure in Jean-François Lyotard
Recommendations
Search

리오타르의 무의식과 형상

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Journal
Heidegger-Gesellschaft In Korea 현대유럽철학연구 현대유럽철학연구 제51호 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2018.1
Pages
277 - 308 (32page)

Usage

cover
The unconscious and the figure in Jean-François Lyotard
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This article focuses on the reflection of Lyotard’s psychoanalytical period, in which he tried to restore the authority of the unconsciousness and the form which were oppressed by consciousness and language. Freud questions the certainty of consciousness which is unquestioned in modern philosophy, and points out that unconsciousness is the basis of true perception. Lyotard follows Freud's position and turns away from Marxism, which is at risk of totalitarian thinking, and introduces psychoanalysis as an alternative to social transformation. This is to eradicate the Western rationalist tradition of returning everything to theoretical discourse, including those that can not be reduced to theoretical discourse. For this reduction is accompanied by distortion and alteration of the reduction. In other words, if the unconsciousness and the form are reduced to the theoretical discourse, the latter exercises oppression and violence to the former. Therefore, we testify that there are things that are not reduced to consciousness and language, and that seeing the world and self as a linguistic world is not a representation of the real world, but rather a local recognition. Furthermore, it will be argued that the unconscious and the non-verbal are more fundamental rather than the conscious and the verbal. In this process, it will be confirmed that the uniqueness, liveliness, and nobleness of the form that can not be expressed in language, that is, the so-called 'exteriority of language', are revived. And also the validity and limitations of Freud and Lacan's model of the relationship between discourse and form as well as the relationship between consciousness and unconsciousness, From this, we would suggest the art which is related to the drive of death as an alternative to psychoanalysis, which is related to the principle of pleasure, as an alternative to avoiding the danger of Hegel’s speculative philosophy. The introduction of the concept of form and drive of death will bring back to art a space of truth that can not be reduced to all discourse and knowledge.

Contents

No content found

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.