지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I have examined how the Karen hill tribe of Thailand resisted to the government's "Policy of Integration" in the Karen viewpoint and the Thai government interactions. In particular, I looked at the Karen in relation to “Zomia” to understand how they resisted to the Thai government. Zomia is a high mountain area where ethnic minority people live and it contains the meaning of resistance and escape. However, Hinlatnai Karen villagers who living in Zomia not only resisted or escaped as James Scott insisted, but they fought by the direct demonstration and claimed their demands. I explain the hill tribes living in Zomia as ‘resistance identity’ because they could resist through direst demonstrations and preserve their cultural and historical heritage to the government. The Thai government implemented the nation-building through the nationalization of the space during the process of making 'the people'. The prohibition of the traditional farming method, shifting cultivation, and the forest policy were not for the hill tribes but for the expansion of the territory and the securing of manpower. In addition, the Thai government's imposition of Thai language and Buddhist beliefs was also part of the nation-building. Hinlatnai Karen villagers formed Northern Farmers Network in collaboration with other 117 hill tribes, social and non-governmental organizations. And in 1995 they raised massive protests which more than 10,000 protesters participated. The villagers also have scientifically proved that the shifting cultivation is suitable for Karen's cultural ecosystem and is a nature-friendly lifestyle. They tried to maintain their traditional culture by focusing on cultural experts called Hiko. Village groups and village fund also became the basis of the traditional culture and consciousness inheritance of them. Finally Thai government established ‘Karen Livelihoods Restoration Policy’ in 2010 and Hinlatnai village were designated as ‘Cultural Special Zone’ to admit and protect their culture. These changes of the village are the result of the Karen resistance and the interaction with the Thai government.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
비슷하되 같지 않은 길: 재한 미얀마 카렌족 공동체의 형성과 발전
동남아시아연구
2016 .01
-
종족정체성 수호가 교육정책에 미친 영향: 태국 카렌족 넝따오 마을과 넝몬타 마을 비교
한국태국학회논총
2019 .01
-
“Be the Good Child”: Aspirations and Challenges of Karen Youth Refugees Resettling in America
Journal of Asia Pacific Counseling
2025 .02
-
태국 대중문화 콘텐츠에 나타나는 문화코드 : 드라마를 중심으로
한국태국학회논총
2024 .02
-
태국어 신체 어휘 후아(/hua/, ‘머리’)의 다의성에 관한 인지언어학적 고찰
동남아연구
2019 .01
-
태국의 카렌족 정책 연구: 킴리카의 이론을 중심으로
한국태국학회논총
2016 .01
-
‘앎’과 ‘존재함’의 얽힘: 캐런 바라드의 agency에 대한 교육적 함의를 중심으로*
초등교육연구
2024 .01
-
อดีต ปัจจุบัน และอนาคต ศตวรรษที่ 21 การเรียนการสอนภาษาไทยกับวัฒนธรรมไทยในฐานะภาษาต่างประเทศ
한국태국학회논총
2016 .01
-
합리성, 구조, 문화적 시각을 통한 태국의 정치변동 분석
한국태국학회논총
2017 .08
-
โครงการสร้างมาตรฐานการเรียนการสอนภาษาไทย ในสาธารณรัฐเกาหลี ภายใต้กฎหมายว่าด้วยการส่งเสริมการเรียน การสอนภาษายุทธศาสตร์ : โอกาสและความท้าทายในอนาคต
한국태국학회논총
2022 .02
-
태국 근대 국가 이미지의 표상:방콕 퀸 씨리낏 직물 박물관
동남아시아연구
2020 .01
-
วัฒนธรรมนานาชาติในสังคมไทย ภาพสะท้อนจากพจนานุกรม
한국태국학회논총
2015 .01
-
การจัดทดสอบวัดระดับภาษาไทยในสาธารณรัฐประชาชนจีน
한국태국학회논총
2018 .01
-
การใช้เกณฑ์การประเมินการเขียนแบบแยกประเด็น (Analytic Rubrics) กับความสามารถในการเขียนของนักศึกษามหาวิทยาลัยฮันกุ๊กภาษาและกิจการต่างประเทศ และนักศึกษามหาวิทยาลัยปูซานภาษาและกิจการต่างประเทศ
한국태국학회논총
2019 .01
-
อวัจนภาษาไทย: ความรู้ที่ครูผู้สอนสนทนาภาษาไทยไม่ควรมองข้าม
한국태국학회논총
2015 .01
-
แนวทางการใช้ส่วนประสมทางการตลาดแบบไทย และแนวคิดเศรษฐศาสตร์พฤติกรรมเพื่อการส่งเสริมการท่องเที่ยวเกาหลีในหมู่นักท่องเที่ยวชาวไทย
한국태국학회논총
2024 .08
-
ปรากฏการณ์พหุนัยของคำว่า “กิน” ในภาษาไทย : การศึกษาตามแนวภาษาศาสตร์ปริชาน*
한국태국학회논총
2019 .01
-
태국어의 품사와 문장 성분에 관한 연구 -수식사를 중심으로-
한국태국학회논총
2021 .02
-
한국의 태국 연구 : 동향과 과제
아시아리뷰
2017 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0