메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제49권 제4호
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
123 - 148 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to read the aspects of discourse and ethics in Salman Rushdie’s major political novels—Midnight’s Children, Shame, The Satanic Verses, and The Moor’s Last Sigh—in terms of Jacques Lacan’s theory of discourse and ethics. His theory of discourse is useful in understanding how a discourse is formed and works in society and how antagonism arises from discourses in conflict, while that of ethics suggests an alternative to the problem of discourse. The ‘Rushdie Affair’ caused by The Satanic Verses shows the discourse of religion can function as Master’s discourse in a society. And also this point is well described in Midnight’s Children, Shame, and The Moor’s Last Sigh. For example, the Indian subcontinent is divided into India and Pakistan by two master signifiers of Hinduism and Islam. Both religions continue to have negative effects on the politics, thereby making dictatorship prevail in both nations, especially in Pakistan. The antagonism between the Islamic and Western world, as shown in the ‘Rushdie Affair,’ can never be solved. Likewise, as indicated in the division of India-Pakistan, the reconciliation and harmonious living between Muslims and Hindus also cannot be accomplished. In this sense, the ‘Rushdie Affair’ and his political novels reveal the impossibility of a true ethical act in the level of discourse, without identification with symptoms.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0